87
Metascore
9 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 100TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineOne of director Jack Conway's finest efforts, the film never suffers from a sense that the novel has been compressed or rushed. Moving, fresh and aware of its effects, this film stands as one of Hollywood's finest adaptations of a novel.
- For more than two hours it crowds the screen with beauty and excitement, sparing nothing in its recital of the Englishmen who were caught up in the blood and terror of the French Revolution and of Sydney Carton, who gave his life for his friends.
- 90Los Angeles TimesLos Angeles TimesEndearing, sumptuous 1935 adaptation of Dickens' sweeping epic set against the French Revolution. [15 Oct 2006, p.E10]
- 88Chicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonChicago TribuneMichael WilmingtonThe first, and best, of the three versions of Charles Dickens' tale of the French Revolution. [05 Dec 2008, p.C5]
- 88Portland OregonianTed MaharPortland OregonianTed MaharThe historical details of costumes and settings are exemplary and the cast superb. Those best of times and worst of times must have looked much like this. [12 Jul 1996, p.39]
- 80The GuardianSteve RoseThe GuardianSteve RoseVintage screen Dickens with a cutting edge: the French terror is vividly, hauntingly realised, all chaos and guillotine ghouls. [16 Aug 2000, p.23]
- 80The New York TimesThe New York TimesDirected by Jack Conway, the picture is a compelling expansion of Dickens's story of the French Revolution, with the central role of Sidney Carton, a disreputable lawyer, memorably projected by Ronald Colman. [14 Feb 1999, p.6]
- 70The New YorkerPauline KaelThe New YorkerPauline KaelIt's a creditable though unadventurous film, handsomely staged in the M-G-M backlot style for classics.