54
Metascore
9 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75Slant MagazineEd GonzalezSlant MagazineEd GonzalezForbes’s direction is uncluttered and makes excellent use of the long shot, and though the film threatens to run out of steam at each and every turn, it never runs out of ideas.
- 70The A.V. ClubKeith PhippsThe A.V. ClubKeith PhippsWith its references to consciousness-raising groups and other archaic matters, it's very much of its time, but the film is effective for its vision of homogenized suburbia as a place in which housewifery has made women as interchangeable as the mass-produced products in their supermarket.
- 50Chicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertChicago Sun-TimesRoger EbertIt's never really believable, but it tries to be, and it would have had a better chance as straight satirical comment.
- 50TV Guide MagazineTV Guide MagazineIra Levin is an eclectic writer who has done comedy-drama (Sleuth), adventure (The Boys from Brazil), thrillers (Rosemary's Baby), and science fiction such as The Stepford Wives. But Goldman's screenplay and Forbes's ponderous direction slow his exciting novel to a laborious pace.
- 50Chicago ReaderChicago ReaderThe cast—with the happy exception of the always delightful Paula Prentiss—is uniformly dreary; and by the time the mystery begins to take shape, it's hardly possible to care.
- 50The New YorkerPauline KaelThe New YorkerPauline KaelIt's so tastefully tame that there's no supsense.
- 50Time OutTime OutWilliam Goldman's leisurely script and Forbes' dull direction never quite capture the subtleties of Ira Levin's novel about an idyllic Connecticut commuter village where the housewives are a bunch of domesticated dummies.
- 40NewsweekNewsweekA shallowly satiric suburban joke that says some ugly and unsupported things about what kind of women men really want. [03 Mar 1975, p.70]