When the Joker takes advantage of his vandalism of fine art being appreciated as pop art itself, Batman must discover his true scheme.When the Joker takes advantage of his vandalism of fine art being appreciated as pop art itself, Batman must discover his true scheme.When the Joker takes advantage of his vandalism of fine art being appreciated as pop art itself, Batman must discover his true scheme.
John Alban
- Art Exhibit Patron
- (uncredited)
Jerry Catron
- First Henchman
- (uncredited)
William Dozier
- Narrator
- (voice)
- (uncredited)
Duke Fishman
- Pablo Pincus
- (uncredited)
Jody Gilbert
- Mrs. Putney
- (uncredited)
Chester Hayes
- Leonardo Da Vinski
- (uncredited)
Mike Morelli
- Jackson Potluck
- (uncredited)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThe name "Baby Jane Towser" is a parody of Baby Jane Holzer, a socialite who was part of Andy Warhol's circle and was prominent in the NY art scene during that era. In fact, Holzer acted in Batman Dracula, Warhol's 1964 tribute to the character.
- GoofsWhen Robin pulls his face out of the pink goo, it actually pulls his mask down, away from his eyes. In the next shot, this mistake has been corrected and the mask is back in place.
- Quotes
Dick Grayson: [the Joker gets an applause from the audience at an art show he is taking part in] How can they clap for that crook?
Bruce Wayne: Don't forget, Dick, this is a home town crowd and Joker's from Gotham City.
Dick Grayson: Hmm!
- ConnectionsReferenced in Batman (1989)
Featured review
Good But Not Great Joker Two-Parter
The Joker and Bruce Wayne get into "pop art".
I have never been into paintings and I was a child of the 1970s instead of the 1960s, so many of the jokes in this two-parter went a bit over my head. To me atleast, some of the humour in this adventure seemed a bit too simple minded, such as the bit where the Joker "corrects" Bruce on his artistic skills. The wit of the Batman series is usually more clever than this. But again, this might just be me being out of my element. There is a lot to enjoy in this two-parter.
The parts where Robin and Bruce Wayne (not Batman) team up are well done and part two is actually better than part one.
I mainly know Fritz Feld from his three Lost In Space appearances, as "Mr Zumdish", and he seems to be playing almost the same character here.
And finally, the smash hit Batman movie of 1989 almost seems to be paying tribute to this episode as Jack Nicholson (The Joker) shares the same terrible sense of art as Romero does here.
This might not be my favourite Joker adventure, but this 1966 Batman series is just not capable of doing a bad episode...so enjoy!
I have never been into paintings and I was a child of the 1970s instead of the 1960s, so many of the jokes in this two-parter went a bit over my head. To me atleast, some of the humour in this adventure seemed a bit too simple minded, such as the bit where the Joker "corrects" Bruce on his artistic skills. The wit of the Batman series is usually more clever than this. But again, this might just be me being out of my element. There is a lot to enjoy in this two-parter.
The parts where Robin and Bruce Wayne (not Batman) team up are well done and part two is actually better than part one.
I mainly know Fritz Feld from his three Lost In Space appearances, as "Mr Zumdish", and he seems to be playing almost the same character here.
And finally, the smash hit Batman movie of 1989 almost seems to be paying tribute to this episode as Jack Nicholson (The Joker) shares the same terrible sense of art as Romero does here.
This might not be my favourite Joker adventure, but this 1966 Batman series is just not capable of doing a bad episode...so enjoy!
helpful•42
- StuOz
- Jun 9, 2018
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content