35
Metascore
15 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75Slant MagazineSlant MagazineA moment's patience is soon rewarded by Anderson's vast store of rich, intoxicating imagery.
- 60EmpireDan JolinEmpireDan JolinStupid, with three o's. But also fun, never boring, and never insulting (to anyone other than Dumas) - unlike certain of the summer's A-pics…
- 50VarietyLeslie FelperinVarietyLeslie FelperinA very 2011 take on Alexandre Dumas' classic that feels weirdly dated already. Although adequately entertaining thanks to lavish production values and game supporting perfs, this anodyne adaptation lacks a killer hook that would help it cross over to a demographic beyond action buffs and fanboys.
- 50Boxoffice MagazineSara Maria VizcarrondoBoxoffice MagazineSara Maria VizcarrondoTrash-action director Paul W.S. Anderson's (Alien vs. Predator) finds no cultural purpose for this rather literal adaptation of the Musketeers, but it's not so horrible it deserved to be protected from the cold eye of film critics.
- 42The A.V. ClubKeith PhippsThe A.V. ClubKeith PhippsBeyond being unable to decide what kind of Musketeers movie it wants to be, Anderson's adaptation seems determined to underachieve as both heavy spectacle and light adventure. It's two mediocrities for the price of one.
- 3D swashbuckler wields a disappointingly blunt sword.
- 35MovielineMovielineIt's not the addition of airships and male dangly earrings that make Paul W.S. Anderson's take on Alexandre Dumas' classic, much-adapted adventure such a drag, it's everything else - the incoherence, the anvil-heavy dialogue, the lack of anything beyond the broadest of characterizations.
- 30Chicago ReaderChicago ReaderThis one is overblown, over-dressed, and grandiosely dopey, packed with gargantuan sets and ludicrous action scenes and shot in unusually dark and dingy 3-D.
- 25Chicago TribuneMichael PhillipsChicago TribuneMichael PhillipsThis latest version is le pits.