Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Fear the Walking Dead: The Good Man (2015)
Season 1, Episode 6
1/10
Who are we supposed to be rooting for? Besides...
12 October 2015
Warning: Spoilers
...Victor, Chris and Alicia.

*** POTENTIAL SPOILERS FOR THE WALKING DEAD, BREAKING BAD AND BATTLESTAR GALACTICA (2004), and WORLD WAR Z (THE BOOK!!!) ***

First, let me start by saying, you aren't a hater if you have a valid opinion and aren't trolling.

Second, I can't add much more to the stupid logic of releasing 1000s of zombies to rescue a couple of people except that, you make it more difficult to rescue said family members as well as get one killed. Sorry, Liza.

Oh, and Chris, your mom was killed because your dad, your step-mom and this idiot barber decided to release the zombies to help rescue her. Well done.

Too bad Nick didn't die.

Third, let's also take the logic that you have the military and an arena full of zombies two blocks away and you use padlocks, chains and boards of wood to contain them. Where there no torches, steal beams and concrete available. Yet another convenience for plot stupidity. So, yeah, the military deserves blame too.

On the subject of military stupidity and plot contrivance, Max Brooks did say, in order most to survive, you have to sacrifice some. But, I don't think that "some" included people you already saved. So, leaving the people in the fenced in neighborhood and those you had in on your base count... unless your "heroes" release a giant horde of zombies, the you are all SOL.

Fourth, Travis, Madison and Daniel aren't heroes. Madison, Daniel and Daniel's daughter are all culpable for the torture of that soldier.

The reason Breaking Bad, Battlestar Galactica and The Walking Dead work is that in the former YOU AREN'T SUPPOSED TO LIKE WALTER WHITE, and the latter two, while people may do bad things, you have voices of reason speaking out against it and the weak shoe horned pleas from Daniel's daughter and Travis' being PO'ed don't count. There is no moral conundrum. These people acted horribly - in both torture and mass murder via arena zombies - and the writers expect us to like these people. To feel empathy when Travis has to kill Liza. Hey, idiot, her death is your fault.

Fifth, why did Liza die? There was no reason for it. And for no one to notice that she's been bit? Was there no blood or did the enamel friction from the bite immediately cauterize the wound? Another contrivance for no reason what so ever.

Yeah, I thought Bob's bite in the Walking Dead was a bit contrived too, but that was handled better. Bob started off as a bad character, but redeemed himself. There is nothing Travis, Madison and Daniel can do to make me like them. They killed most of the army base, Dr Exner had to kill her patients and herself, and they made a bad apocalypse worse.

Lastly, Nick was annoying to begin with, stealing his neighbor's morphine was a low blow. He's a selfish a-hole, whose withdrawal immediately disappeared when it wasn't convenient to the plot. He's a bad character, a bad person and waxing philosophical to Madison at the end, doesn't even come close to explaining or justifying his existence or behavior.

I won't hate on this show anymore, I gave it every chance, and I won't be coming back... Unless they kill everyone but Victor. He's the ONLY interesting character in the show.

OR, put him in The Walking Dead. Have him walk up to the Alexandria walls in his suit. I'd love to see him with a group of deeply flawed but interesting characters who deserve his presence.

Liza - the only other interesting character in that group is dead, and Chris and Alicia are pretty much plug-and-play characters, but they are fairly inoffensive, so they can stay.

Thankfully, The Walking Dead returned and totally hit the ground running.
25 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Lost: I Do (2006)
Season 3, Episode 6
1/10
WORST SHOW EVER!!! - possible spoilers.
9 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Well they just LOST 3 viewers last night - my roommates and I are DONE! The Jack/Kate/Sawyer storyline is lame and has ALWAYS been lame. To focus on it for 4 out of 6 episodes is lame. Cliffhanger? Will Sawyer die? Who cares! Kill 'em all. Kate isn't EVEN hot anymore now that she's a cry-baby looking for love. Oh, and Sawyer con-man with a heart. Both characters have lost their teeth, and Jack is still annoying. Send them all home. Kill them. I don't care, just get rid of that storyline.

We'll come back when we return to Lock, Charlie, Hurley, Desmond, Sun, et al... the smoke monster's MUCH more interesting. What about Dharma. They all had Dharma scrubs! Has anyone forgotten about this.

Not too mention that there'll be about 20 lame recap episodes before February too...

I'm staying with Battlestar Galactica. See ya!
8 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Strong Potential/Weak Execution!
28 June 2006
Warning: Spoilers
Bryan Singer has made it no secret that he was going to make this film a sequel of sorts to the first two Superman films which starred Christopher Reeve. Which I though was an interesting idea even though I thought Superman 2 was lame. However, I thought the premise of Superman returning after a long absence was a great idea, unfortunately Singer's heavy reliance on the first two films really crippled this film.

Some minor film details are included in my comments below which may hint at spoilers...

**********

I attended a screening of Superman Returns last night, and even though I'm not the biggest Superman fan, I was REALLY looking forward to seeing this film. I have to admit I had misgivings about the casting of Kate Bosworth and Brandon Routh because there were too young. However Brandon Routh was the BEST Superman yet and Kate Bosworth really did very well as Lois Lane. Kevin Spacey was GREAT as Lex Luthor, especially when he and Routh (briefly) shared the screen. However Parker Posey was wasted in a dull cliché.

The opening credit sequence was amazing. Hearing the original Superman theme gave me chills. The next 45 minutes of the film were awesome. Lex's reintroduction demonstrates at his ruthlessness even on a smaller scale. Clark Kent/Superman's return home was thoughtful and well done, as was the reintroduction to the crew at the Daily Planet.

However, because Singer assumes that we all saw the first two films he apparently does not feel the need to develop any of the characters outside of Superman and Lois. Lex Luthor's character is just a caricature of a mustache twirling villain, and even though Spacey does this very well, it's hard to take him seriously as a threat. His "evil" plan is nothing more than a rehash of Gene Hackman's Lex Luthor the 1978 film except using crystals instead of nukes. There is NO REAL logic behind his motives at all if you think about it. More importantly you just don't care if he succeeds or not. Lex Luthor's character is only validated in the very brief face to face confrontation with Superman at the end.

Let me say that Lex/Superman confrontation at the end is one of the BEST scenes in the whole film and further proof of wasted potential. Lex Luthor shows how truly evil he can be, and again Spacey does an amazing job here. The on screen presence of Brandon Routh and Kevin Spacey together was SO good. Routh could really hold his own next to Spacey. Too bad Singer couldn't have found a way to elaborate on this scene or do something more interesting with the characters than just having Luther (figuratively) twirl his mustache and have Superman pine over Lois Lane the whole film.

Overall, this film is bound in a weak story with plot holes big enough to drive a truck through. The story relies too heavily on the Superman/Lois Lane love story so much so that the rest of the film, and the other characters, just feel like an after thought.
374 out of 544 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Illogical garbage... spoilers!
22 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
This movie is the worst. It could have been so good, but what can you do. The tripods and death rays were really cool, but that's it.

SPOILERS...

Tripods, buried underground... you are telling me that we never found these things. Humans have figured out what the Earth's core is like... and why bury these things 1000 years ago... Maybe we should bury tanks in Iraq for the future. Did the Martians (or whoever) not have any new technological break throughs over the last millenia?

It's also good Tom Cruise's son (in the movie) is a homing teenager, he can find his way to Boston, on foot, during the end of the world and STILL beat his dad there...

Also, what's with his mom and her parents all safe and sound in their little brownstone in Boston? Did these people not feel the need to evacuate? Did the aliens not really hit Boston all that hard? I mean they totaled Bayonne... was this a more strategic target...

This movie sucks... and NOW Tom "koo-koo" Cruise has the American remake rights to the Pang Brothers' great movie The Eye... oh, lord... why don't they get Spielberg to direct that movie and make it a family-sensitive-feel-good-movie with Dakota Fanning?
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed