Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Rush fans, see. Sellers fans, avoid.
6 December 2004
The Roomie and I sat down for a nice evening of HBO Sunday night television. Unexpectedly, the HBO current drama, The Wire, wasn't on in order that HBO could feature its movie, The Life and Death of Peter Sellers.

I must say, I expected a bit more from the movie, hoping it would be a bit more entertaining. HBO's preview certainly made it look as if it would be more upbeat. Geoffrey Rush commands a superb performance of the famous actor, his own characters and the brief cutaway scenes wherein Rush portrays various other characters in the movie notwithstanding. But the movie, which I wouldn't even classify as dark comedy, was ultimately depressing.

Peter Sellers is presented as a childlike and selfish man with no personality of his own who faced anything serious in his life by retreating into characters. The writers show him as a megalomaniac, who only returns to Blake Edwards' Pink Panther films after he has a series of cinematic failures and is basically broke.

Academy award winning actress Charlize Theron is the opposite of Aileen Wournos, portraying Sellers second wife and 60s starlet, Britt Eckland. Her Swedish 'accent' is unconvincing. English character actress Miriam Margolyes does a wonderful job as Peg Sellers, the overbearing mother who created the monster of self and arrogance that Peter Sellers apparently became. The movie also features John Lithgow, playing John Lithgow as Blake Edwards (Geoffrey Rush does a better job at Edwards in a brief cutaway scene), and a decent performance by Stanley Tucci as Stanley Kubrick.

Emily Watson, best known for her Oscar-nominated role in Hilary and Jackie, also has an outstanding performance as Anne Sellers, Peter's first wife and source of emotional support, long after their divorce.

Ultimately, I would not be surprised if Sellers' children or any of his wives had a strong hand in the making of this film, given the sympathetic portrayal of both Anne Sellers and Britt Eckland as well as Anne's children, Michael and Sarah. Although in general, the acting provided award-winning performances, notably by Rush, this movie should be included in a long line of bitter, posthumous bio-epics that began with Mommie Dearest.

If you are a great fan of Geoffrey Rush, and want to watch one of the performances of his life, see The Life and Death of Peter Sellers. If you are, like I am, a huge fan of Peter Sellers' life work, then rent any one of his many motion pictures, but avoid this movie at all cost.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Visual achievement make up for plot deficiencies
4 August 2001
I must say, after seeing the PotA edition of Exposure I took their advice and went into the movie without considering that this was the second adaptation of a French novel from the sixties--trying to watch it as if it were an original script. That gave me no expectations and disappointment that things were so different.

The surprises (including Charlton Heston's cameo) just kept me glued to the screen. I even enjoyed the ironic twist at the end even if it made very, very little practical sense. Paul Giamatti deserves extra credit for an outstanding comedic performance. Tim Roth has never been sexier.

My only disappointment was the serious lack of explanation, mainly toward the end. I think they allowed way too much freedom for our imagination and we deserve to know just how (...)

Rich Baker can look forward to his Seventh Oscar for Best Makeup at next year's Acadamy Awards.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Fight Club (1999)
10/10
I couldn't blink...
3 July 2000
We had rented the Special Edition on DVD the day our DVD broke. Returning the movie, we picked up the video. I'm sorry we had to see it on Videocassette--we are going to buy the DVD to see it in letterbox.

I was enthralled with Edward Norton's performance from the very start. I felt as if I left the room I would miss something, and my eyes were focused on the screen for the duration of the movie.

The movie is intense, but it has very sophisticated undertones. Children, especially teenage boys, may enjoy the movie for the violence, but only the most mature or intelligent will truly comprehend the reasoning behind the fighting.

I have to add that I sympathized heavily with our characters. Being 33 myself, I am a member of that "forgotten" generation--the Post-Baby Boomers born during the duration of the Vietnam War. We're slaves to a society run by our parents and owned by our grandparents. Anarchy may not be the answer, but it sure seems to deserve consideration--if only for a fleeting moment.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed