Reviews

57 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Happy Valley (II) (2014)
4/10
Just okay, but too many Pro-PSU and Paterno's interviewed
31 December 2023
I was expecting more of an independent look or balance in this thing going into it, and it seems there are 25% of the people interviewed are or for the victims of Sandusky, and the other are 75% on the side of Paterno or the school pleading ignorance.

None of the people important to establishing a third-party POV to the situation, like Sara Ganim, state or local officials, ex-school officials, etc. Are interviewed which is beyond disappointing as it doesn't provide any additional context to this situation. It is a very binary presentation of what happened in Happy Valley.

It doesn't help the last part of the show is a defense of Joe Paterno from all of his allies and family. I'm sure PSU fans loved it, but the rest of the audience does not understand why this had to be a part of the film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Waco: The Aftermath: Reckoning (2023)
Season 1, Episode 5
4/10
Series went out with a whimper
4 June 2023
The trial scenes were okay, even though it is not nearly what happened in real life with the sentencing of the remaining church members, but at least it wrapped up that storyline.

The really bad attempt at storytelling was how Oklahoma City unfolded, and specifically the bombing itself, where the series ended at that awful visual effects package of the bombing. Seriously, that must be the worst VFX of the year by 2022-23 standards. It's like they spent a few hundred dollars on it and had a kid work on it from his basement. It was that cheap and just plain awful of a visual effect.

As for the story leading up to the OKC bombing, there was really no lead up beyond the Elohim City storyline. Nothing about the Nichols, the process of prepping the bomb, or any of the blunders made by McVey which is how he got caught in the first place.

Just a poor attempt overall at a series.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Series is still very underwhelming
30 April 2023
So here in the third episode, they only spend about 5 minutes on the road to the Oklahoma City bombing and less than ten minutes on the trials of the Davidians.

This is shameful, as the title is supposed to be "Post Waco", not focusing on the old David Koresh days and replaying the cut scenes from the first Waco series.

It continued again and again over this episode, with no real reason they had to show those scenes. There were even very few Livingstone scenes about the trial as well.

With only three episodes left, this series is going to be left incomplete it feels, with no real story behind Tim McVey or Gary Noesner trying to chase him.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Show is better when more center left/right guests are on
23 April 2023
This is one of the better episodes in a while, specifically when Bill has more non-political or more moderate left guests who don't have to constantly answer Bill's political questions.

This episode was more toned down on the political questions, along with medical/COVID ones like in previous episodes, and you can tell the guess feel more relaxed to chat with a lot less on-set tension and such.

As a viewer, it was much more enjoyable and playful overall, which made for a much better listen. I really wish this show would follow this model more often instead of the political fringes like the start of this season did.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Waco: The Aftermath: A Common Enemy (2023)
Season 1, Episode 2
5/10
Story is already sloppy and going everywhere, even though it is only E2 of 6
23 April 2023
A real strong point of the series so far is the ramp-up story to the Oklahoma City bombing and Timothy McVey's radicalization, with a second being the Waco trial of the remaining church members, but there is so much time being wasted each episode so far going over the past.

I don't know why the writers insisted on going back into Koresh's story and replaying the raid over and over again taking up valuable story time that could have been dedicated to the OKC bombing, the investigation of far right neo Nazi groups, and the trial itself.

The viewers have already seen the Waco series. We don't need to see it over and over again, to the point it feels like they are talking all of the B-roll from the Waco series, putting into this series, and calling it something "new". It's not; it's recycled content.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Storm Chasers: What Goes Around... (2010)
Season 4, Episode 1
10/10
This might be the oddest episode of Stormchasers, and I love it
10 March 2023
To review this episode, this is what happens:

1. Reed hits himself in the head with a baseball bat after testing the armor the new Dominator. Reed falls to the ground injured.

2. Sean Casey gets mad in real time when he sees there is a new, improved Dominator compared to leaky TIV.

3. Reed moons Sean and the TIV team while passing them on the highway, all while the roof of the new Dominator peels off while they are doing it, causing Sean to laugh right back at them, and then you have a shot of Reed literally with his pants down mooning Team TIV while he realizes the roof is slowly peeling off on top of him.

This is Oscar-worthy comedy, and I love it.

On the other hand, there are not many storms in this episode, but starts off one of the best seasons of the series overall.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Real Time production staff continues to mail it in
25 February 2023
What the heck was going on with this episode? That Christoph Waltz interview might have been one of the worst one in the history of Real Time, and one of the worst on HBO ever, with both Bill and Waltz not really being prepared or doing anything resembling a professional interview.

This is how it went:

MAHER: "From looking at the trailer, THE CONSULTANT is really about how generational gaps exist in the workplace, right?" (Maher, admitting he didn't see the series, any of the synopsis, any reviews, or had anyone on his team actually watch the darn thing, misses the whole point of the series, which is a thriller about the end of a startup when the capital stops flowing in.)

WALTZ: "Yeah, well, I don't know (inaudible laugh)" (Not sure what was going on with Waltz, other than him not being prepped by anyone.)

Just a terrible effort by Maher's people having Waltz on for no real reason, and then a total lack of preparation by Bill and his team to interview Waltz or double check to make sure he could actually go on the the stage. Just a big time lack of effort and interest all around in terms of Bill and his staff which has been beyond apparent this season.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Bill, when does the comedy start?
28 January 2023
I still don't know what is going on with this show now that it is in Season 21, but now with less guests than ever, it seems this show has totally jumped the shark with Bill and his staff mailing it in most of the time. I don't know if the production budget and staff were heavily cut down, but now down to three guests from five and then just not a lot of visible production quality (specifically the verbal and physical bits), it seem this show is standing on its last leg.

The guest quality to me is a huge concern. I did like the mix of right and left-leaning guests, but now it seems like he goes further to the Libertarian fringe than ever before with a bunch of no names or has-been's. It's almost like they are there just to reinforce Bill's POV's than anything else. Maher isn't there to learn, clarify, or rebuke; he's just there to stand on his platform, scream at certain groups, and nothing else.

Even worse, the sharper Bill from years' prior does not seem to be present at all. A whole bunch of lies can be told on his show to him, and he just moves the ship along ignoring them to center around his thoughts. He is not prepared to push back, nor does he want to. It's just one big grievance fest centering around Maher's world is the whole point of the hour.

I don't know why WBD (Warner Bros Discovery) hasn't cut this show yet short of Maher's 2024 contract end date, seeing the rampage they have been on the last few months in terms of reorganizing the entire company, specifically HBO.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Coach Prime: The Perfect Season (2023)
Season 1, Episode 4
6/10
Was going to be a really good series, until this super softball ending
17 January 2023
I know this is a series in the eyes of Deion Sanders, but this episode really disappointed me at the end when it was known he was going to take the Colorado job before all the episodes were released.

The series, and Coach Prime to his credit, did a good job of tackling Jackson and HBU-issues and addressing them in the first three episodes of the series as they were happening, but it did not handle the end of Sanders's tenure at JSU very thoroughly.

It seems like there was a white washing to what went down at the end with his decision to move on from JSU, as they did not interview any of the assistant (or younger) coaches and players to get their opinion on what was happening with him leaving. Simply, the narrative and storyline was controlled by Sanders, and it was beyond apparent.

I was hoping they would cover how coaches hop from better job to better job, the business of college football in general, or the much larger, complex issue of HBU funding which causes these decisions to happen, but we had none of that. No other nuisance or insightfulness. Just a few tears and goodbye, with Sanders not passing the mic or screentime to anyone else.

It feels like there was a missed opportunity here, which soured a really good series otherwise.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Thrill Seekers (1999 TV Movie)
8/10
This is a great 90's-era made-for-tv movie
15 January 2023
There is something that draws me in about a made-for-tv movie, in this case it was for TBS, in the 1990's using nothing but Canadian actors filmed in Canada that is supposed to resemble New York or other parts of urban America.

This is that movie.

The concept of the script is actually somewhat original with a B or C-level production budget that can make everything look cheap from the sets, editing to the visual effects. The worst part is they use film and disaster scenes from other 1990's movies, like "Money Train" and "Executive Decision" among others, but it isn't to the point where it ruins the story but detracts from the special effects you'd expect to find in a disaster movie.

The acting is overall done well, not the greatest, but still holds up well with the script.

There is obviously some bad post-2000 futuristic looks in it, but for the most part it does not distract all that much.

This is still a really good, rewatchable disaster film.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Watchmen (2009)
9/10
Very good for the time it was brought out and stayed true to the graphic comic book
14 January 2023
As an earlier Zack Snyder film, this did a good job of bringing the comic book to life while having a good overall story line.

Even though there were not many (to any) of the top actors in it, the general cast did a pretty good job of acting with the script they had. I thought there was a lot more that could have been added to the story or to another sequel film in a series of Watchmen films, but this one off was good enough for me.

The best part to me at least was the photography of the time frame of the period (the 1980's and such) as the sets and overall vintage theme worked well, and again, stayed true to the comic series.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A mashup of other "Dark Side of the Ring" Vice episodes and don't cover much new ground
25 December 2022
I was looking forward to this being a deep dive of all of the controversial business decisions Vince made through the decades of his leadership, but instead, it is just mashups of the most watched "Dark Side of the Ring" episodes where Vince is heavily involved.

I know Vice's team did this to cut down on the production and writing expenses, but in the end, it's not a very good documentary by any stretch of the imagination.

There was a lot of controversy to cover with Vince, but again, they limited the scope severely, specifically how bad he treated the talent that is retired and remaining, let alone the ones he threw away and ending up dying tragic deaths.

The ending was okay with regards to how he cashed out with the WWE IPO, but then it opened him up to discovery on all of his sexual misconduct hush payments made through the company. That part was okay, even though the documentary didn't really explain that his family is still in charge of the thing with him "no longer" there, or out of active management supposedly.

It also feels like this documentary and the "Dark Side of the Ring" series is here just to rebuke A&E's "Biography: WWE Legends" WWE-produced fluff series, but it doesn't do the greatest job of that even. Still, I watched this and the series, so it was good enough for me but nothing I would want to rewatch.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Good thriller story and action, but holy cow, was the audio mixing *that* bad?
25 December 2022
I thought Richard Gere made a great villain in this bad cop vs. Good cop thriller, but I was having a real hard time making out what both Gere and Andy Garcia were saying throughout the film, especially in the more pivotal scenes where the dialogue was muffled to the point where you didn't know what they were saying.

Some of the scenes are just fine, but between the ambulance and final scene, the audio seemed bumbled over the background music, meaning this film was not mixed very well either in the recording or in post production. It ruined the dialogue, which is needed in these kinds of thrillers.

Again, not a bad film, but clearly had some production issues.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark Side of Comedy: Artie Lange (2022)
Season 1, Episode 4
9/10
A sad episode of how family trauma can deepen the despair of a person
18 December 2022
I really like Artie even though he was before my time of coming into age of the Stern Show and enjoying comedy, so I never knew his back story. I knew him through Madtv and as Howard Stern's sidekick, and then one day he was off the Stern Show for good after all of the infighting and addiction behaviors.

I didn't know about his whole backstory, and how he really had a blue collar, straight upbringing that tailspinned after the death of his father, and the type of guilt he had after that.

I also didn't know he relapsed that much, but the show did a good job of covering that and struggle people overcome to becoming clean, then falling right back into a life of abuse.

It also shows how addiction to substances really drives You also saw how Howard was having trouble finding the happy medium of what can be seen as entertainment for the show, and then how that was actual, real anger and conflict and how it plays out on the show in real life. Howard not being there for Artie at times was super disappointing, as this episode covers.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A few parts really well done, but still feels like a cheap Heat knockoff
4 December 2022
Positives: There's good action in this cops vs. Robbers general narrative.

Also the plot is decent, even though there truly are "more holes than swiss cheese" in the storyline.

As for the negatives: I can stand this trying to follow in the footsteps of Heat, but there is a problem with two specific aspects:

1. This is shot in Atlanta, not LA. And you can tell to the point it destroys the production value. The ATL is not LA by any stretch of the imagination. Even the photography is screwy with the sandstone Southwestern tones they used during the editing process, which was driving me nuts the whole time. There's just too much green in the background of the Atlanta based shot scenes, which causes the entire film's color balance to fall off.

2. The actual character development is beyond weak, to the point where it doesn't really add anything.

The action and general heist concept is overall pretty good, but feels there are many shortcuts throughout the film that could have made it better.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Some very funny parts, but not sure about the premise
3 December 2022
I fully expected this to be a raunchy R-rated movie poking fun at westerns a la Family Guy, as it appears a lot of people did not realize this would be the case per the reviews in the past. It is obvious this film follows a common arc between MacFarlane's movies like Ted and the Family Guy universe. This movie delivers on this premise.

There are a few highlight montages of the shooting gallery training and the cut aways (again, a Family Guy-thing) that does add to the overall value of the film and are laugh out loud scenes. Still, there is a lot of filler material in between them that can break the rhythm of the overall movie.

What I also think it does a good job of is making fun of the whole "western" genre and making fun of life at that time. Everything from the bar brothels, the violence and the herding.

This movie does feel a little cheap in terms of the set design, as I am also adamant MacFarlane should not be top billing in these kinds of movies, where he should write, produce, and direct, but I'm not sure about him being the overall lead of the series. He can be support cast also, but his behind the scenes work is better than his on screen work.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Untold: Crimes and Penalties (2021)
Season 1, Episode 4
9/10
Best "Untold" Story so far in terms of covering a topic I heard about, but never really knew the whole backstory of what was going on until seeing this episode.
24 November 2022
There are a couple of really bright sports for why I think this is the top Untold story: 1. You see how Galante mixed in with the world of the actual NY mob, specifically "Matty the Horse" Ianniello.

2. It talks to both The Galantes' and the Feds simultaneously, showing a balance in narratives and storylines and how the mob operated in Connecticut using price fixing and violence. The Feds actually go over the surveillance and "building the case" evidence against Galante which was extremely through.

I thought there was something special about this since they are creating a new miniseries on this criminal enterprise (that I also look forward to seeing soon), as it should be great dramatized.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dark Side of Comedy: Andrew Dice Clay (2022)
Season 1, Episode 2
8/10
Good overall summary of Dice's comedic career, from someone who was not alive during that era
19 November 2022
The episode did a good job of his back story and where he came from to develop the persona, and then how that persona took over like a runaway freight train with no one really in control including Dice.

It's odd because I like the presentation of what Dice was trying to do, but the content was a whole other story. I was never really a target for him but may have been in his audience if I was around in that time.

I thought the delivery of the jokes was different, unique method worth paying attention to, however the targets were certainly problematic. No one ever really knew, as the comedians in the episode mentioned this a few different times and ways. No one knew where the line was, or what Dice's true feelings or intentions were, and that was the problem. He never made that clear which seemed to be his downfall where no one knew if it was a bit or his reality.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This documentary is better than what "Concussion" and Will Smith could ever think to create
12 November 2022
Don't watch the dramatized version of what happened, as this is the original documentary based off the book of the NFL's coverup of head injuries.

Note I don't say concussion, as that term is very misleading to the actual scope of the problem: It is about repeated blows to the head instead. Hence, the main premise of why I have such a problem with the Disney movie.

Instead this documentary follows the path of NYT and ESPN reporting, and also books "Head Games" and "Brain Game", which would have been the best title for this decades long investigation and cover up, incorporating all of these perspectives into the documentary. Even the NFL, to their credit, had their representatives interviewed here.

I thought this did a good job of covering from the beginning what happened to Mike Webster, all the way to Junior Seau's death and the current state of the NFL at the time of release. It is a long documentary, but worth the time to see how potentially damaging this game is to youth, specifically if injuries and bad techniques are prevalent.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Zero Hour: Disaster at Chernobyl (2004)
Season 1, Episode 1
10/10
One of the first, and as factual and fair as possible, real-time documentaries of the Chernobyl disaster
5 November 2022
Before there were any other series on this, most notably Craig Mazin's HBO/Sky Chernobyl, there was this documentary that best explained what happened that terrible night, including the some now-Ukrainians who were there working the night it happened, and ended up living to tell about it.

The series went even as far to recrate exactly what happened early that AM using one of the other control rooms at the Lenin/Chernobyl Nuclear Plant in Ukraine at the time the episode was created.

It doesn't do much post-accident exploration, as that is not the purpose of the whole Zero Hour series, but is more to focus on the minute-by-minute play of what happened in the control room.

It is fair in terms of giving a complete assessment of what happened, putting fair blame on the operators, supervisors and the Soviet system overall and not to point fingers at one specific party or come up with conspiracy theories.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
This is a very solid miniseries. It's no Wire, but a very rewatchable series from David Simon and his team.
2 November 2022
I can see how this can be a triggering watch if you are a beat copper LEO (specifically at the municipal level, as this story was about how the Feds and County came in, took down the crooked cops, and looked triumphant in the end), especially because of the amount of bad street policing and policy that are explored during this series. It's critical look, but it is fair as Simon, like usual, spares no sacred cows. There's no simple story here, just layers and fault all around, which is Simon's MO for all of the series and novels he writes.

The series follows closely Justin Fenton's book with regards to how the GTTF of Baltimore City were modern day pirates, doing everything from putting away violent offenders, putting away drug dealers and stealing all of their proceeds (money, guns and drugs), putting away innocents and stealing a load of their money, and taxpayer-funded overtime from everyone in the city.

While this is the main storyline, Simon intertwines a whole bunch of other stories like the Freddie Gray Riots, the consent decree investigative process against the Baltimore Police Department, and even the mysterious death of BPD Detective and former GTTF member Sean Suiter towards the end of the series. This feels like overload at best, where even eight episodes might not thoroughly cover it all well.

It is a lot of content for six episodes, which is where my complaints generally come from. The time shifting doesn't help all that much either, as there are multiple time shifts back and forth (at least 4-6 per episode from my count) as that is just way too much to deal with. You blink and then miss a timeline change, which was in the form of a tiring cutaway of someone electronically filling out a timesheet, and can only tell there was a shift by the model of police cars, cell phones, other civilian cars and clothing of what year it could be.

While the series was true to the book, the novel was more thorough because it wasn't jammed into having a script limit like this series did. It feels that is one of David Simon's big downfalls here, is that he didn't want to do more episodes on these storylines and deep dive some of the other angles. As one example, it feels this whole series rushed through the trials part (even though most of them plead guilty), and then rushed through the fallout of what happened with the Mayor, new chief, and the overall crime rise in the city. To add, he didn't really explain why the War on Drugs reinforced these bad behaviors as that would have been nice, but instead we get less than eight minutes with the grizzled, old school detective who is now at the BPD training facility teaching ethics. Simon whole narrative says, "It's the War on Drugs" causing this, but he doesn't show how it's causing this. That's what I wanted to see explained in further detail.

Further, I do think David Simon's people skills being so rough in the industry and his complex relationship with HBO was the fault line that prevented another 2-4 deserved episodes from being in this series. Heck, he even admitted his own persona was the problem in a lot of the recent 20th Anniversary of The Wire interviews he did over the course of the summer. I know the word on the street has been that he does not play well with others all that much, but it feels like someone down the road should be able to pick up whenever Simon and Ed Burns decide to retire. Regardless, what they did was important TV that will survive for many more decades. I believe this series will be the same.

As for the next generation of storytellers like this, I keep wondering who will take up the mantle here as a lot has changed in terms of the way urban life, disfunction and crime is covered in these areas now with the overall Press being decimated compared to the Baby Boomer/Gen X era.

We need more good content like this, if not better, going beyond The Wire.
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We Own This City: Part One (2022)
Season 1, Episode 1
8/10
A messy, pin-setter of a first episode, but don't let it stop you from watching the rest of the series
29 October 2022
The best way I can describe this first episode of the series is that it is sort of like bowling, specifically that time between the gate coming down in your bowling lane on the first frame, and the pins are picked up, swept, replaced, and then the gate comes up. It is that critical time that sets up the next frame, but can seem like forever while your bowling ball is returned and you can then start your routine for Frame 2.

It is a necessary process, but might seem like a waste, but it is not. That is what EP01 of We Own This City.

The three plus story lines are laid out in this episode with the least focused on the GTTF. It is more looking at how the GTTF originally landed on the radar of both county-level law enforcement and then was eventually referred to the Feds.

It can get boring at times in addition to the general confusion that is happening, but understand in EP02 there will be more clarity in general along with the picture being clearer.

It is the roughest episode to watch of the series, but keep going. You do not want to stop watching this series.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
We Own This City: Part Six (2022)
Season 1, Episode 6
10/10
This is a good wrap up episode, but the series should have been longer
24 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This episode does wrap up the storylines nicely, most are really bleak (only positive was the sentencing of the GTTF), but it shows the desperation of how Baltimore keeps falling further into social despair. Things like political criminality, throwing even more money towards policing for required equipment, the continuation of ineffective police tactics and staffing, and violent (mostly gang-related) crime that never seems to cease.

The one area that tends to fall short of my expectations is the BPD training instructor scene, who It take it is supposed to be a composite character for Ed Burns (he is the real life ex-70's BPD detective, turned retiree, turned instructor) and his experience as BPD turned teacher turned police instructor turned author, but it feels Simon goes from 0 to 100 in why the War on Drugs is responsible for all of this mess. There's really no explanation of why Simon and Ed go straight to that conclusion, which leaves me with a load of questions on how drug nonenforcement will reduce violent crime, including gang-related violence.

I know the two of them are very anti-War on Drugs (I am, but not to their extent) which is a good thing seeing what it has done to municipal-level policing, but I continue to have a hard time imaging a world where the foot is removed from the gas pedal of the War on Drugs, and what comes out of it. Will it actually be progress and a reduction in crime? No one really knows in the end if significant funds are re-allocated to from enforcement to treatment and such.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
End of Watch (2012)
9/10
A good quasi-buddy cop vs gangster film that doesn't devolve into blind copaganda, even by 2013 standards
23 October 2022
This film is almost ten years old but still holds up well, and sadly still, to the current issues in urban policing.

The better area David Ayer focused on in this film was the trouble of being the jet fuel burning, hard charging, results-driven, upwardly mobile (the detective's exam and education to get there) nature quality officer on the street, and the trouble they run into both internally in the department and can of worms that can be opened when going after the "big fish" in the organized crime/gang elements of the cities. The dynamic of officer vs. Sarge, officer vs. Detective, officer vs. Shooting board, senior officers vs. New hires, and etc. Is a layer of realism most cop dramas don't really want to show, as it shows a level a functional conflict (normal, healthy arguments) and the dysfunctional ones officers and other agencies (the second half of the movie) have on a daily basis of just doing the job.

Just by the way the film is setup, where you have this parallel story between Pena and Gyllenhaal and then the Curbside Gang is a real good juxtaposition how there is more in common with these groups rather than the law vs. The lawless. It is basically like the more modern version of Thief where cops and robbers were role swamped.

It also does a good job of going past the drug war, where drugs are certainly a part of the enforcement, but instead there is a prioritization on the violence and human trafficking portion of gang activity, at least in my mind where there needs to be a more unified law-enforcement focus even at the present time.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Wire: Clarifications (2008)
Season 5, Episode 8
9/10
Not as salty about this episode now as I was in 2008
9 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I did not like when this episode first came out and Simon and his team had to kill off Omar. I thought it was a disservice to not either A) Let him ride until the finale, or B) Make him one of the few to get out of the game alive. Simon did neither, so the scene at the later half of the episode was a total shock and make me sick to my stomach.

Now in 2022, I am not that mad about it since what unfortunately happened with Michael K. Williams, but was always hoping the series could be rebooted and he would be in it again as Omar.

Upon Michael's passing, that is when I sort of cooled off about how Simon handled the Omar character, but still makes me sad we won't see any more of the character (or even the series) as it used to be.

In terms of how Season 5 was the close out season of the series, I know no one makes it out of Baltimore alive in hindsight, but this was tough to watch when it first came out. This was probably more due to the fact the show was ending more than anything else.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

Recently Viewed