Ritchie's departure from his typical flashy style is evident in "The Covenant," a weighty war film that commands attention. Despite its deliberate pacing and a prolonged build-up, the conclusion arrives swiftly, leaving audiences gripped. While much of it treads familiar ground seen in recent war cinema, the film takes a notable detour, delving into the profound camaraderie among soldiers, an unspoken allegiance binding them. Although Gyllenhaal delivers a commendable performance, Dar Salim steals the spotlight as Ahmed, infusing the narrative with genuine emotion and suspense. Ritchie's restrained direction adds to the film's memorability, elevating it above its peers in the genre. Yet, the plot falls short of authenticity, resembling more of a fantastical narrative than a reflection of reality. Despite the stellar cast, the storyline feels superficial, reminiscent of a mishmash of "Lone Survivor" and "Rambo" clichés, with an oversimplified portrayal of American heroism. While the action sequences hold merit, the film's exploration of the risks faced by interpreters offers a refreshing perspective. However, the pessimistic conclusion, depicting the Taliban's resurgence, prompts contemplation on the film's narrative choices. For enthusiasts of films akin to "Top Gun" with their glorification of American heroics, "The Covenant" may resonate. Yet, its predictability and lack of depth ultimately render it forgettable, earning a modest six out of ten. Ritchie's attempt to depart from his signature style feels out of touch, failing to leave a lasting impression amidst a saturated market of war cinema.
Reviews
55 Reviews
Interstellar
(2014)
Interstellar: A Cosmic Odyssey with Patches of Brilliance
28 April 2024
Interstellar: A Cosmic Odyssey with Patches of Brilliance.
Interstellar, the brainchild of British director Christopher Nolan, embarks on a grand journey through the cosmos, but its trajectory is somewhat erratic. While not devoid of merit, the film falls short of reaching celestial heights, despite its lofty aspirations.
Set against a backdrop of a dying Earth, the narrative centres on Cooper, once a skilled pilot reduced to farming the barren land. When he stumbles upon a clandestine NASA operation, he's thrust into a daring mission: to find humanity a new home amongst the stars. It's a proposition laden with emotional weight, as it means leaving behind his children.
Nolan deftly injects heady doses of science, including wormholes and time dilation, into the storyline, challenging viewers to grapple with cosmic complexities. Yet, the film's ambition sometimes eclipses its coherence, leaving audiences adrift in a sea of conceptual overload.
Nevertheless, Interstellar boasts stunning visuals and a stellar cast led by Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway. However, the pacing occasionally lags, and the denouement veers into the realm of the implausible, straining credibility.
In contrast, "Black Hole Blunder" delivers a scathing assessment of Interstellar's narrative flaws. Its reliance on contrived plot devices, like manipulating gravity to communicate through a black hole, stretches believability to breaking point. The reviewer questions characters' motivations and highlights inconsistencies in the film's scientific underpinnings.
Despite its shortcomings, Interstellar dazzles with its breathtaking imagery and thought-provoking themes. Nolan's cinematic prowess shines through in his depiction of space as a mesmerising frontier. Hans Zimmer's haunting score adds emotional depth, though some performances fail to soar.
Ultimately, while Interstellar may not attain the heights of Nolan's previous masterpieces like Memento, it remains a bold and ambitious venture. It invites audiences to ponder humanity's place in the vast expanse of the universe.
In summary, Interstellar is a captivating yet flawed odyssey that navigates the cosmos with ambition but occasionally loses its way. Despite its narrative hiccups, it stands as a testament to Nolan's visionary zeal and his knack for posing profound existential questions.
P. S. In my humble opinion, McConaughey's accent, reminiscent of Ron Woodroof from "Dallas Buyers Club (2013)," may seem out of place in "Interstellar (2014)." Here's why:
* **Futuristic Setting:** A space exploration film set in the future naturally suggests a world with a wider range of accents. People might migrate more freely, resulting in a melting pot of cultures and dialects.
* **Genre Expectations:** Sci-fi films often feature a more standardized form of English for clear communication across vast distances. McConaughey's strong regional accent disrupts that expectation.
* **Comparison to Other Characters:** The lack of diversity in accents makes McConaughey's drawl stand out even more.
Interstellar, the brainchild of British director Christopher Nolan, embarks on a grand journey through the cosmos, but its trajectory is somewhat erratic. While not devoid of merit, the film falls short of reaching celestial heights, despite its lofty aspirations.
Set against a backdrop of a dying Earth, the narrative centres on Cooper, once a skilled pilot reduced to farming the barren land. When he stumbles upon a clandestine NASA operation, he's thrust into a daring mission: to find humanity a new home amongst the stars. It's a proposition laden with emotional weight, as it means leaving behind his children.
Nolan deftly injects heady doses of science, including wormholes and time dilation, into the storyline, challenging viewers to grapple with cosmic complexities. Yet, the film's ambition sometimes eclipses its coherence, leaving audiences adrift in a sea of conceptual overload.
Nevertheless, Interstellar boasts stunning visuals and a stellar cast led by Matthew McConaughey and Anne Hathaway. However, the pacing occasionally lags, and the denouement veers into the realm of the implausible, straining credibility.
In contrast, "Black Hole Blunder" delivers a scathing assessment of Interstellar's narrative flaws. Its reliance on contrived plot devices, like manipulating gravity to communicate through a black hole, stretches believability to breaking point. The reviewer questions characters' motivations and highlights inconsistencies in the film's scientific underpinnings.
Despite its shortcomings, Interstellar dazzles with its breathtaking imagery and thought-provoking themes. Nolan's cinematic prowess shines through in his depiction of space as a mesmerising frontier. Hans Zimmer's haunting score adds emotional depth, though some performances fail to soar.
Ultimately, while Interstellar may not attain the heights of Nolan's previous masterpieces like Memento, it remains a bold and ambitious venture. It invites audiences to ponder humanity's place in the vast expanse of the universe.
In summary, Interstellar is a captivating yet flawed odyssey that navigates the cosmos with ambition but occasionally loses its way. Despite its narrative hiccups, it stands as a testament to Nolan's visionary zeal and his knack for posing profound existential questions.
P. S. In my humble opinion, McConaughey's accent, reminiscent of Ron Woodroof from "Dallas Buyers Club (2013)," may seem out of place in "Interstellar (2014)." Here's why:
* **Futuristic Setting:** A space exploration film set in the future naturally suggests a world with a wider range of accents. People might migrate more freely, resulting in a melting pot of cultures and dialects.
* **Genre Expectations:** Sci-fi films often feature a more standardized form of English for clear communication across vast distances. McConaughey's strong regional accent disrupts that expectation.
* **Comparison to Other Characters:** The lack of diversity in accents makes McConaughey's drawl stand out even more.
Road House
(2024)
Road House Remake Shambles
8 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Blimey, "Road House" (2024) is a right corker! Most streaming films these days are utter rubbish, wouldn't you agree? But this one's a proper gem, a cracking action flick that'll keep you glued to the telly. Gyllenhaal's brilliant as ever, brings a bit of gravitas to the fun and the fight scenes are top-notch. Had a right good laugh too, the humour's spot on. A jolly good romp, reckon most folks will enjoy it. Not exactly Shakespeare, but a right exhilarating watch!
However, some right git named McGregor ruined what could've been a belter. Started well, Gyllenhaal smashing it as usual, script had some corking jokes. Then McGregor waddles in, couldn't act his way out of a paper bag! Spouted rubbish one-liners and the fight scenes looked like a toddler made them out of cardboard. Dreadful shame, could've been an action classic with a decent lead.
All in all, the remake's a right mess. Feels like a posh telly show, all flash and no substance. Dialogue's pants, characters duller than dishwater, and the plot's thinner than a crisp. McGregor adds nothing, just a bloke with a goofy grin and a dodgy walk. A bit of an odd choice, really. Jake's alright, some decent fights, but McGregor? Stick to the original, much more natural experience.
However, some right git named McGregor ruined what could've been a belter. Started well, Gyllenhaal smashing it as usual, script had some corking jokes. Then McGregor waddles in, couldn't act his way out of a paper bag! Spouted rubbish one-liners and the fight scenes looked like a toddler made them out of cardboard. Dreadful shame, could've been an action classic with a decent lead.
All in all, the remake's a right mess. Feels like a posh telly show, all flash and no substance. Dialogue's pants, characters duller than dishwater, and the plot's thinner than a crisp. McGregor adds nothing, just a bloke with a goofy grin and a dodgy walk. A bit of an odd choice, really. Jake's alright, some decent fights, but McGregor? Stick to the original, much more natural experience.
Oppenheimer
(I) (2023)
Oppenheimer's Conscience Struggle
21 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
J. Robert Oppenheimer, a brilliant yet troubled physicist, wrestled with his conscience throughout his career. As a young scholar in Cambridge, his anxieties led to a peculiar incident. Later, he emerged as a pivotal figure in American physics, tying the knot with a communist and engaging in an extramarital affair. The discovery of nuclear fission in 1938 cast a long shadow. Fearing that the Germans might weaponize it first, Oppenheimer assumed leadership of the Los Alamos Lab during World War II, charged with constructing an atomic bomb. Despite concerns about a catastrophic chain reaction, the bomb was assembled and deployed on Japan, a decision that continued to haunt Oppenheimer thereafter.
Following the war, Oppenheimer advocated for international oversight of nuclear arms. However, the Cold War era ushered in heightened tensions and renewed interest in hydrogen bombs. This, coupled with Oppenheimer's previous communist connections, led to a contentious security hearing where his loyalty was called into question. His security clearance was rescinded, effectively terminating his influence on nuclear policy. Despite being ostracized, Oppenheimer was eventually honoured with the Enrico Fermi Award in a gesture of reconciliation. A flashback reveals his true dread: not of disloyalty, but of triggering a nuclear arms race that could engulf the world.
"Oppenheimer," I would exclaim passionately. Thirty percent of the film delves into the post-war scrutiny of Oppenheimer, alternating between black-and-white scenes and a confined room setting where vague allegations, primarily focused on his associations with communist comrades and paramours, are loosely hurled. Approximately fifteen percent of the movie explores his romantic entanglements, featuring a scene where he duplicitously misleads a government operative tasked with preventing leaks. Unfortunately, these aspects are merely skimmed over, overshadowed by a strong emphasis on Washington politics, notably Oppenheimer's security hearing and Strauss's Senate confirmation hearing. Despite his personal shortcomings, Oppenheimer emerges as somewhat of an antagonist due to his contributions. The film's soundtrack also proves grating. While glimpses of the bomb's development are showcased, the narrative primarily revolves around Oppenheimer's post-war interrogation and his romantic dalliances. The overall tone feels overly melodramatic, reminiscent of a romance film rather than a historical drama.
Oppenheimer's endeavor to shield a friend by misleading a state official, while rational, is depicted as a frantic and unjust act by the investigators, which seems improbable given the repercussions such actions would entail in authoritarian regimes. The absence of Lise Meitner, a pivotal figure in atomic research, is glaring. The film's focus on Oppenheimer's personal life over the scientific endeavor behind the bomb's creation is disappointing. Nolan's fondness for cinematic flair appears to overshadow the necessity for a coherent narrative. The runtime exceeds two and a half hours, testing the audience's patience, much like "The Imitation Game" did with its ponderous debates. The film's portrayal of Oppenheimer's investigation as relatively equitable is undermined by its gossipy nature, casting doubt on the protagonist's sympathy.
The excessive drama and dearth of substantive content fail to validate the film's existence, particularly when contrasted with more insightful depictions of historical events. The disregard for scientific and ethical quandaries faced by the Manhattan Project team, as well as the moral ramifications of the atomic bombings, is regrettable. The protracted storytelling detracts from the film's potential impact, with the narrative feeling disjointed and lacking historical fidelity. Despite portraying Oppenheimer's flaws, the film neglects to address the broader ramifications of his actions, such as the betrayal of atomic secrets to the USSR by communist associates. In sum, "Oppenheimer" falls short of its potential, overshadowed by its superficial concentration on personal drama rather than substantive historical inquiry.
Following the war, Oppenheimer advocated for international oversight of nuclear arms. However, the Cold War era ushered in heightened tensions and renewed interest in hydrogen bombs. This, coupled with Oppenheimer's previous communist connections, led to a contentious security hearing where his loyalty was called into question. His security clearance was rescinded, effectively terminating his influence on nuclear policy. Despite being ostracized, Oppenheimer was eventually honoured with the Enrico Fermi Award in a gesture of reconciliation. A flashback reveals his true dread: not of disloyalty, but of triggering a nuclear arms race that could engulf the world.
"Oppenheimer," I would exclaim passionately. Thirty percent of the film delves into the post-war scrutiny of Oppenheimer, alternating between black-and-white scenes and a confined room setting where vague allegations, primarily focused on his associations with communist comrades and paramours, are loosely hurled. Approximately fifteen percent of the movie explores his romantic entanglements, featuring a scene where he duplicitously misleads a government operative tasked with preventing leaks. Unfortunately, these aspects are merely skimmed over, overshadowed by a strong emphasis on Washington politics, notably Oppenheimer's security hearing and Strauss's Senate confirmation hearing. Despite his personal shortcomings, Oppenheimer emerges as somewhat of an antagonist due to his contributions. The film's soundtrack also proves grating. While glimpses of the bomb's development are showcased, the narrative primarily revolves around Oppenheimer's post-war interrogation and his romantic dalliances. The overall tone feels overly melodramatic, reminiscent of a romance film rather than a historical drama.
Oppenheimer's endeavor to shield a friend by misleading a state official, while rational, is depicted as a frantic and unjust act by the investigators, which seems improbable given the repercussions such actions would entail in authoritarian regimes. The absence of Lise Meitner, a pivotal figure in atomic research, is glaring. The film's focus on Oppenheimer's personal life over the scientific endeavor behind the bomb's creation is disappointing. Nolan's fondness for cinematic flair appears to overshadow the necessity for a coherent narrative. The runtime exceeds two and a half hours, testing the audience's patience, much like "The Imitation Game" did with its ponderous debates. The film's portrayal of Oppenheimer's investigation as relatively equitable is undermined by its gossipy nature, casting doubt on the protagonist's sympathy.
The excessive drama and dearth of substantive content fail to validate the film's existence, particularly when contrasted with more insightful depictions of historical events. The disregard for scientific and ethical quandaries faced by the Manhattan Project team, as well as the moral ramifications of the atomic bombings, is regrettable. The protracted storytelling detracts from the film's potential impact, with the narrative feeling disjointed and lacking historical fidelity. Despite portraying Oppenheimer's flaws, the film neglects to address the broader ramifications of his actions, such as the betrayal of atomic secrets to the USSR by communist associates. In sum, "Oppenheimer" falls short of its potential, overshadowed by its superficial concentration on personal drama rather than substantive historical inquiry.
Dog Pound
(2010)
Personally, I found myself more captivated by Adam Butcher
5 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
The 2010 rendition of "Dog Pound," drawing inspiration from the 1979 classic "Scum," delivers a heightened experience, though not necessarily surpassing its predecessor. However, its denouement falls short when compared to the gratifying conclusion of the original. While many pivotal scenes from "Scum" are faithfully reproduced in "Dog Pound," the stark depiction of the prison environment in the former is favored. In "Dog Pound," there's a conspicuous absence of the callousness exhibited by the officers in "Scum," who are portrayed more as surrogate social workers. Younger audiences, commencing with "Dog Pound," may incline towards favoring it over "Scum." Personally, I found myself more captivated by "Dog Pound," particularly due to the introduction of the lead character. Director Kim Chapiron ought to have acknowledged Roy Minton, the writer of "Scum," for the script. While "Scum" may feel antiquated with its pervasive bleakness, "Dog Pound" falls short by being excessively lenient. Despite some adult characters displaying nuance, the primary plotlines remain strikingly similar, underscoring a dearth of creative innovation in recent film production.
Three young lads, Butch, Davis, and Angel, find themselves within the confines of Enola Vale nick in Montana. Officer Sands duly admits them, keeping a close eye particularly on fiery Butch, known for his previous transgressions. Goodyear, a firm yet fair screw, imparts advice to the lads, urging them to comport themselves for a shot at redemption. Though Butch attempts compliance, he soon finds himself a target for Banks, the alpha inmate, along with his cronies, Eckersley and Loony. Refusing to divulge information, Butch lands himself in solitary confinement. Tragedy strikes when Angel meets his demise and Davis chooses to end his own life. Fueled by a thirst for revenge, Butch incites a riot, only to be thwarted in his escape attempt, leaving him battered and broken by the riot squad.
Three young lads, Butch, Davis, and Angel, find themselves within the confines of Enola Vale nick in Montana. Officer Sands duly admits them, keeping a close eye particularly on fiery Butch, known for his previous transgressions. Goodyear, a firm yet fair screw, imparts advice to the lads, urging them to comport themselves for a shot at redemption. Though Butch attempts compliance, he soon finds himself a target for Banks, the alpha inmate, along with his cronies, Eckersley and Loony. Refusing to divulge information, Butch lands himself in solitary confinement. Tragedy strikes when Angel meets his demise and Davis chooses to end his own life. Fueled by a thirst for revenge, Butch incites a riot, only to be thwarted in his escape attempt, leaving him battered and broken by the riot squad.
The Ballad of Buster Scruggs
(2018)
I only liked "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" and "Near Algodones".
26 February 2024
"The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" is a 2018 anthology film that intertwines the tales of six characters in the Wild West post-Civil War era. Initially, my curiosity piqued by James Franco's "First Time?" meme, but any amusement quickly faded. Despite some acclaim, I found the stories dreary and lacking purpose, though some hail them as "brilliant". While the film boasts strong characters and picturesque cinematography, it left me disconnected. Notably, Tim Blake Nelson's portrayal captivated me, particularly in the first skit. Yet, upon closer inspection, the film's redeeming qualities are scarce beyond its aesthetics. The narrative feels fragmented, leaving much unexplored.
While the violence adds a dark humor, it fails to capitalize on its potential. The disjointed nature of the tales detracts from their impact. Despite the promising setup, the stories ultimately fall flat, lacking substance and depth. The title misleads, as only the initial tale truly embodies it. Viewing the film as a series of disconnected shorts, each ending abruptly, reveals its shortcomings.
Although the film's first segment shines, the rest struggle to maintain momentum. The humor varies, with some segments veering into darkness. Overall, the tales are bleak without delivering genuine tragedy. In essence, "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" presents itself as a splendid garment, yet upon closer examination, reveals itself to be lacking in substance.
While the violence adds a dark humor, it fails to capitalize on its potential. The disjointed nature of the tales detracts from their impact. Despite the promising setup, the stories ultimately fall flat, lacking substance and depth. The title misleads, as only the initial tale truly embodies it. Viewing the film as a series of disconnected shorts, each ending abruptly, reveals its shortcomings.
Although the film's first segment shines, the rest struggle to maintain momentum. The humor varies, with some segments veering into darkness. Overall, the tales are bleak without delivering genuine tragedy. In essence, "The Ballad of Buster Scruggs" presents itself as a splendid garment, yet upon closer examination, reveals itself to be lacking in substance.
Loki
(2021–2023)
Loki
13 February 2024
In the 2021 series "Loki," the mischievous character resumes his antics post "Avengers: Endgame." The show boasts a strong ensemble, with Tom Hiddleston and Owen Wilson shining particularly bright together. However, despite their efforts, the series falls flat due to a convoluted storyline and questionable character development.
The chemistry among the cast is palpable, but it can't save the hollow plot or the absurdity of the multiverse concept. The attempt to emulate "Doctor Who" with a Loki twist fails to deliver a compelling narrative. The writing lacks depth and coherence, with the storyline meandering without purpose.
Season 2 exacerbates these issues, with Jonathan Majors' performance drawing criticism for its affected stutter. The plot becomes increasingly nonsensical, relying on the charisma of the cast to maintain any semblance of engagement. It's evident that Disney is prioritizing spectacle over substance, banking on the franchise's popularity to carry weak storytelling.
The fundamental flaws in the show's premise, such as the TVA's ability to reset timelines at will, undermine any tension or stakes. Questions about character motivations and the logic of the universe remain unanswered, highlighting the show's lack of narrative cohesion.
In summary, "Loki" suffers from poor writing and a reliance on gimmicks rather than meaningful storytelling. Despite strong performances, the series fails to deliver a compelling narrative, ultimately leaving viewers disappointed and questioning the direction of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
The chemistry among the cast is palpable, but it can't save the hollow plot or the absurdity of the multiverse concept. The attempt to emulate "Doctor Who" with a Loki twist fails to deliver a compelling narrative. The writing lacks depth and coherence, with the storyline meandering without purpose.
Season 2 exacerbates these issues, with Jonathan Majors' performance drawing criticism for its affected stutter. The plot becomes increasingly nonsensical, relying on the charisma of the cast to maintain any semblance of engagement. It's evident that Disney is prioritizing spectacle over substance, banking on the franchise's popularity to carry weak storytelling.
The fundamental flaws in the show's premise, such as the TVA's ability to reset timelines at will, undermine any tension or stakes. Questions about character motivations and the logic of the universe remain unanswered, highlighting the show's lack of narrative cohesion.
In summary, "Loki" suffers from poor writing and a reliance on gimmicks rather than meaningful storytelling. Despite strong performances, the series fails to deliver a compelling narrative, ultimately leaving viewers disappointed and questioning the direction of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
The Obituary of Tunde Johnson (2019)
8 February 2024
In the account of Tunde Johnson, a wealthy Nigerian-American youth, tragedy strikes when he is fatally shot by the police during a routine traffic stop. Yet, his demise is not final, as he finds himself ensnared in a perplexing time loop, condemned to relive the day of his untimely demise repeatedly. This ordeal compels Tunde to confront profound truths about his existence and grapple with the complexities of his identity.
Despite the weighty themes of racism and police brutality, the narrative execution falls short of its potential. While the portrayal of the interracial gay relationship between Tunde and Soren is commendable, the story's delivery lacks the gripping tension necessary to convey its message effectively. The cast, including Spencer Neville as Soren and Nicola Peltz as Marley, delivers solid performances, but the overall impact of the film feels somewhat squandered.
Despite the weighty themes of racism and police brutality, the narrative execution falls short of its potential. While the portrayal of the interracial gay relationship between Tunde and Soren is commendable, the story's delivery lacks the gripping tension necessary to convey its message effectively. The cast, including Spencer Neville as Soren and Nicola Peltz as Marley, delivers solid performances, but the overall impact of the film feels somewhat squandered.
Leo
(I) (2023)
Leo (2023)
30 January 2024
In my review of Leo (2023), a few things didn't quite sit right with me. Firstly, there were too many musical interludes that seemed aimed at a younger audience. I also found it odd that Leo, unaware of his identity, overlooked the visual traits of a tuatara. There was a noticeable mistake in attributing the "sick and should've stayed home" child to Cole W. Instead of Eli. Despite these issues, there were commendable aspects. The scene with the kindergarteners was charming, and Eli's singing with synth music added sophistication. Kabir's witty retort while driving and the touching moments at Hammy #3's funeral and Cole Wiseki's dad gesture were memorable. Leo, with its wise lizard, almost became the year's most amusing film. However, the constant musical numbers, following the 'Frozen' trend, grew tiresome. Leo's story about a talking lizard helping children felt unoriginal, with inconsistent animation and uninspired music undermining its potential. Despite Adam Sandler's involvement, Leo left us wanting a more engaging experience, but its absence from the 2024 Oscar nominations is puzzling.
Red, White & Royal Blue
(2023)
Red, White & Royal Blue
21 December 2023
"Red, White & Royal Blue (2023)" poses a challenge for me, not having read the book, thus I can't assess its faithfulness or compare the adaptation's quality. The narrative unfolds after a public clash between Alex, the President's son, and Britain's Prince Henry, stirring tabloid interest and straining U. S./British relations. Despite a forced truce, their animosity transforms unexpectedly. However, the Amazon Prime original film falls short in execution. The acting, deemed the worst, lacks believability and leans excessively on cheesiness, akin to stage actors misplaced in a movie. The romantic comedy's central theme falters as the leads, meant to be opposites, fail to comically clash. The prince's complex character lacks exploration, leaving an unconvincing love story. Critical elements, such as emails and friendships, remain underdeveloped, hindering emotional investment. While entertaining, the rushed pace undermines potential depth. A two-part movie format might have allowed for better storytelling.
The Marvels
(2023)
The Marvels
23 November 2023
I expressed mixed feelings about "The Marvels," acknowledging its scattered narrative but considering it an improvement over "Captain Marvel." I lamented unwarranted negative previews and attributed Marvel's recent setbacks to the lackluster reception of "Quantumania" and "Secret Invasion" and the SAG strike hindering promotional efforts.
Despite initial skepticism, I found the film more enjoyable than expected. I appreciated the portrayal of Carol Danvers as a more expressive and even awkward character, likening her to a Disney Princess. I also found the Kree's perspective on Captain Marvel as a unintentional villain intriguing, though I wished the film explored this aspect further, drawing a parallel to "Civil War."
The primary weakness, according to I, was the underdeveloped villain Dar-Benn, serving mainly as a catalyst for broader plot elements like the introduction of a parallel universe (X-Men films) and the formation of the Young Avengers. I highlighted unexpected cameos, including Valkyrie, Kate Bishop, and Hank McCoy, expressing relief at a clearer direction for the MCU after a somewhat meandering Phase 4.
In conclusion, I credited "The Marvels" with reinvigorating the MCU, providing hope for a more focused and exciting future for fans.
Despite initial skepticism, I found the film more enjoyable than expected. I appreciated the portrayal of Carol Danvers as a more expressive and even awkward character, likening her to a Disney Princess. I also found the Kree's perspective on Captain Marvel as a unintentional villain intriguing, though I wished the film explored this aspect further, drawing a parallel to "Civil War."
The primary weakness, according to I, was the underdeveloped villain Dar-Benn, serving mainly as a catalyst for broader plot elements like the introduction of a parallel universe (X-Men films) and the formation of the Young Avengers. I highlighted unexpected cameos, including Valkyrie, Kate Bishop, and Hank McCoy, expressing relief at a clearer direction for the MCU after a somewhat meandering Phase 4.
In conclusion, I credited "The Marvels" with reinvigorating the MCU, providing hope for a more focused and exciting future for fans.
They forgot Luis
18 February 2023
How could they forgot Luis? This should have been a person where even at first he only talked to someone in a cafe or walked into the cafe room and saw Scott and said, "They mix you with Spiderman again?" It would have been the best 5-10 minutes of any film to be fair. Yes he could have been fitted in at the beginning. Such a shame. He was the one who gave humor, charm, and attractiveness to the two previous films. For your information, I have to admit that Michael Peña is the only reason I watched Antman (2015) film for the first place. Even if for a small cameo I think Michael Peña would be fine about it considering we don't know if he dusted of Thanos's snap effect. Double disappointment is because they recasted Cassie from Endgame. Apart from that, only the performance of Jonathan Majors as Kang The Conqueror saved this film. Lord Krylar, Jentorra, and Quaz unfortunately they were so easily forgotten. And M. O. D. O. K was not what I imagined or expected, especially the action towards the end. Scott Lang / Ant-Man, Hope Van Dyne / The Wasp, Dr. Hank Pym, and Janet Van Dyne is good as usual. Overall between 6-7, average at best.
The Lucky One
(2012)
At least this film has Zac Efron with dogs
9 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Plot: U. S. Marine Sergeant Logan Thibault returns from his third tour of duty in Iraq, with the one thing he credits with keeping him alive-a photograph he found of a woman he doesn't even know. Learning her name is Beth and where she lives, he shows up at her door, and ends up taking a job at her family-run local kennel. Despite her initial mistrust and the complications in her life, a romance develops between them, giving Logan hope that Beth could be much more than his good luck charm. Complain: The film spent 1 hour 41m and the story was too flat and lacked suspense or gravitas. This was painfully slow, boring and tedious. The best acting came from the grandmother and the little boy. I didn't read the book and didn't like the film. It would have been better if the main characters had a better script and chemistry. And for those who like sweet romance chick-flick, you will definitely love this.
More Than Only
(2017)
If only they made this film more serious
26 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
If only they made this film more serious. I don't know why they make this film as light as possible. From the beginning, the background of the music shifted the feel of the sad story and beyond it. I know the execution of the film will not go as I imagined or I want. Why do they act awkwardly and can't they not talk much? That makes them unbelievable and the chemistry feels fake. I am glad that I am not the only one who found the main character was so annoying. I apologize if I underestimate the character. I know this might be a reality in the real world. But he is always surrounded by friends who support him, and finally there is someone who loves him and that someone loves you back. But you choose suicide. Like seriously? Tell me to protect them from what Justin? That's sounds not a big deal for me. Okay, go for conclusions. The main problem here is that the relationship between father and son is not explored more shown in -depth struggle, and that makes the rest of the movie is as silly as the beginning. I really wanted to like this film actually because of the nice story.
The Dream Children
(2015)
A homoerotic film from Australia?
16 January 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The Dream Children (2015) is a homoerotic film from Australia? Whoa, this is crazy. I have to admit it was very intensively hot physically intimate making this film to another level. I watched few homoerotic -themed films before but not like this and this definitely must be included in the top five on my homoerotic list, I'm sure you too. 😍
Unpopular opinions here that this film is not enough to try to explore deeper about how to adopt legally. Such as I want to know how the process is, I want to know what files/documents are needed. Hidden education is a big opportunity that is missed here. I know and I understand that there is social/religious indoctrination, etc, but it feels like they just jump in to "let's do the illegally way" without suffering or emotional despair in between. The resolution of the character Steve the closeted TV host was also too quickly resolved after a severe internal conflict. And that makes the acting is less believable or realistic. Last, a touch of sadness that is unnecessary on their faces at the end of the film destroys all the optimism mood they build, making me question whether all the things that are done really ends well?
Anyway, ignoring all parts of harsh comments this film is worth watching and is highly recommended. Liked the gay gestures, they nailed it. Good job.
Unpopular opinions here that this film is not enough to try to explore deeper about how to adopt legally. Such as I want to know how the process is, I want to know what files/documents are needed. Hidden education is a big opportunity that is missed here. I know and I understand that there is social/religious indoctrination, etc, but it feels like they just jump in to "let's do the illegally way" without suffering or emotional despair in between. The resolution of the character Steve the closeted TV host was also too quickly resolved after a severe internal conflict. And that makes the acting is less believable or realistic. Last, a touch of sadness that is unnecessary on their faces at the end of the film destroys all the optimism mood they build, making me question whether all the things that are done really ends well?
Anyway, ignoring all parts of harsh comments this film is worth watching and is highly recommended. Liked the gay gestures, they nailed it. Good job.
Da Sweet Blood of Jesus
(2014)
What is this?
17 December 2022
Many people have said that an actor has played a character in at least one bad movie and this proves it. Jesus, I can't believe Rami Malek is in this horrible movie. Oh gosh, I wish I could go back in time and tell him please no. What is he doing here? Plots, Dr. Hess Green becomes cursed by a mysterious ancient African artifact and is overwhelmed with a newfound thirst for blood. Soon after his transformation he enters into a dangerous romance with Ganja Hightower that questions the very nature of love, addiction, sex, and status. For the supernatural side, okay in my opinion. But on the romance side, its very unreal. How come after her husband died then she find her husband's body in the basement and she are still attracted to the protagonist?
The Banshees of Inisherin
(2022)
How long have they been friends?
12 December 2022
Plot: Two lifelong friends find themselves at a dead end when someone suddenly ends their relationship, with dire consequences for both of them. Very good premise, but the background to the conflict is unbelievable. Pádraic, though kind and well-liked by the islanders, is too boring for Colm, who wants to spend the rest of his life composing music and doing the things that make him famous. The only comedic element to me is the way Colm tells Pádraic he doesn't like him anymore, sounds so ridiculous. How long have they been friends? Why don't they know each others character/personality well? Then the storyline doesn't really seem to be going anywhere as the only characters paying attention are Pádraic's sister Siobhán and troubled local guy Dominic trying to defuse the pair's escalating battle. Where are the others? The islanders act apathetic, oddly indifferent, and completely disconnected. However, I love the Irish cinematography, the mystical backdrop, and if those things turn out to be what Colm wants afterwards, he'll get what he deserves.
CODA
(2021)
Coda. Why?
27 November 2022
Why? Why not allowed to give 1 star review here? I'm pretty sure I gave this movie a 1 star review a few months ago. Oh come on, why removed all the 1 star reviews here? Where is the freedom of expression? My previous deleted review is not much different from the review from chinandchin2 which gave a 6/10 star review. This remake version basically skipped all the best parts from La famille Bélier the French version, just tried too hard to avoid copying, and I was not touched at all. Are you guys serious!? So sad, most audiences don't know it's a remake. Even the original version didn't get this much credit or recognition. That doesn't seem fair.
Namor is the boy without love
15 November 2022
Let me sing. Everyday I wake up, then I start to break up. Namor is the boy without love. 😁
What I hate about 'Wakanda Forever' is the length. This movie was incredibly long and you really felt it. This is probably why it's hard to understand why people love this movie, above all else. The scenes and sequences that fill the running time were too boring for me. Instead, I want to focus on questions that no one seems to be asking. What are these Wakandan people? And before they do, Namor and Shuri talk about attacking the rest of the world first and act as if all nations will fall. Riri is here to prepare for her show. Things like Ross and Seinfeld chicks are only there to set up Thunderbolts.
Smile
(V) (2022)
At least it's a good move for horror genre
6 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
At least it's a good move for horror genre, that should be enough. It would be better if only the runtime alone doesn't exceed 90 minutes, and if the film focused more on the scientific side, like hallucinations. E.g. Ghosts are just fairy tales, and there may try to prove scientifically that everyone has their own ghost. The professor who committed suicide, Laura Weaver who witnessed it, and the psychiatrist Rose Cotter, what happened to all of them are just the result of hallucinations and human imagination. Because everyone has experienced trauma in the past and it triggers them. For example, the reason why the ghost smiles at the protagonist because they know what Rose has done in the past. And at the end of the film, the protagonist did exactly what the professor did because she couldn't stand the hallucinations anymore.
Wildhood
(2021)
Good movie, just a bit long for me
2 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
1h 48m. However, there were few struggles or difficulties they faced, it just felt surreal. I mean, for its duration whenever they faced a challenge, they quickly got a way out. Their conflicts were often quickly resolved. Perhaps they want to focus more on heritage and culture. Or maybe I'm just expecting a heavy drama. Ignoring all that, it's actually fine. It's not a cliché and non-superficial way. Beautiful score and soundtrack, tho.
I would suggest a movie, similar but not the same, Donne-moi la main (2008). But read the plot first if you want to watch it, similar in running away from home and hitchhiking to go somewhere. I like movies with walking journee scenes.
I would suggest a movie, similar but not the same, Donne-moi la main (2008). But read the plot first if you want to watch it, similar in running away from home and hitchhiking to go somewhere. I like movies with walking journee scenes.
Genesis
(2018)
Genèse
21 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Just delete the last part in the camp on Félix character. Why should I care about another character that was just introduced at around 1:41:00 minute whose movie is almost over? It was anticlimactic, boring, and disappointing. Because before that part the movie was fine. All the perceptive, poetic, melancholic music is ruined.
Summary plot: The film stars Théodore Pellerin and Noée Abita as Guillaume Bonnet and Charlotte, teenage half-siblings simultaneously struggling with romance; Charlotte is in a relationship with Maxime (Pier-Luc Funk), but is reeling from his proposal that they change to an open relationship, while Guillaume is a student at an all-boys boarding school who is developing a romantic and sexual attraction to his classmate Nicolas (Jules Roy Sicotte).
Sorry to say, it's painful yet beautiful and understandable story without Félix's character.
Summary plot: The film stars Théodore Pellerin and Noée Abita as Guillaume Bonnet and Charlotte, teenage half-siblings simultaneously struggling with romance; Charlotte is in a relationship with Maxime (Pier-Luc Funk), but is reeling from his proposal that they change to an open relationship, while Guillaume is a student at an all-boys boarding school who is developing a romantic and sexual attraction to his classmate Nicolas (Jules Roy Sicotte).
Sorry to say, it's painful yet beautiful and understandable story without Félix's character.
Mid, and its not my cup of tea
17 September 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I have to admit that I didn't get it. This is the third film by Xavier Dolan that I watched after I Killed My Mother (2009) and Mommy (2014). So I'm looking for reviews that help me understand it. And this is what I got, I summarize here (credit to the owner).
"Nothing really happens but it's a movie you can't forget. The movie opens with the main character saying he wishes to kill himself to prove that he can remove master of his own destiny. He wants to tell this to his family. Seeing his family, everyone's different reactions - sad and melancholic (the sister who doesn't know him), simply glad (the mother who loves him), angry and lost (the brother who missed him) and not knowing (his brother's wife). He realizes that he is not only master of his own life, but also master of other peoples' lives. It ends with a shot of a bird - bird of freedom - dying. I can only imagine that in the play that the film is based on, which would have been set much earlier and written as it was during the peak years of the AIDS crisis by Jean-Luc Lagarce, who died of the disease, that in that version, he wasn't out to his family. Perhaps that was what had caused the friction between them all, because I don't feel that his absence was enough of an issue to match their animosity, especially his brother, Antoine's. I also can't see why any other "Terminal Illness" as it is described in the blurb would be so hard to tell everyone about. Ironically, it will certainly appear boring or 'bonkers' to those that aren't familiar with French culture, or those that grew up in 'normal' families. In all cases, it will be painful to watch".
Anyway I watched this as tribute to Gaspard Ulliel and it's so sad that he had to leave us. Rest in peace.
"Nothing really happens but it's a movie you can't forget. The movie opens with the main character saying he wishes to kill himself to prove that he can remove master of his own destiny. He wants to tell this to his family. Seeing his family, everyone's different reactions - sad and melancholic (the sister who doesn't know him), simply glad (the mother who loves him), angry and lost (the brother who missed him) and not knowing (his brother's wife). He realizes that he is not only master of his own life, but also master of other peoples' lives. It ends with a shot of a bird - bird of freedom - dying. I can only imagine that in the play that the film is based on, which would have been set much earlier and written as it was during the peak years of the AIDS crisis by Jean-Luc Lagarce, who died of the disease, that in that version, he wasn't out to his family. Perhaps that was what had caused the friction between them all, because I don't feel that his absence was enough of an issue to match their animosity, especially his brother, Antoine's. I also can't see why any other "Terminal Illness" as it is described in the blurb would be so hard to tell everyone about. Ironically, it will certainly appear boring or 'bonkers' to those that aren't familiar with French culture, or those that grew up in 'normal' families. In all cases, it will be painful to watch".
Anyway I watched this as tribute to Gaspard Ulliel and it's so sad that he had to leave us. Rest in peace.
127 Hours
(2010)
If only the goofs weren't too much
16 August 2022
I think the strength of this movie is the details and when you watch it and find a goof it destroys the whole thing. He was never in pain, nor did he show it was just not realistic (at least to me). From the moment he fell until he was rescued, there was no sign of pain, vomiting, or tears, only self-loathing. More disappointing after reading the goofs section of this site. And unfortunately, his personal backstory is also not very entertaining way of telling either.
I Am Groot
(2022– )
I am groot
11 August 2022
I agree with one of the reviews that this series would have been better released earlier, or at least in 2020 when we were in a situation of strict restrictions and lockdowns due to the corona pandemic and lack of new content.
Tell Your Friends