To the Moderators: I tried to submit this review last night but my computer kept shutting down to update. I hope it was not submitted. Okay, take 3
I enjoy foreign movies, and prefer to have a subtitled copy of a film than a dubbed version. I was happy to see the subtitled version of Burning, even though it was a long film. By the end of the film, I wondered what I missed, and became instantly schooled by the reviews, particularly the reviews that broke down all the plot points, story arcs and political themes. It then dawned on me that Burning is a film that can be viewed by countless people, and everyone will look at it differently. Is that not a form of genius on Chang-dong Lee's part ?
My theory has not been mentioned in the reviews that I read, but forgive me for not reading all 124 reviews. Does anyone think that perhaps Hae-mi was not murdered? I mean, it is a possibility, no? What I have here might be paper thin to some, but here goes...
I think Hae-mi fits the "manic pixie dream girl" trope, but that is neither here nor there. The girl was a possible/probable liar (again, depending on how the individual views her character). All the the well stories did not add up. She could travel pretty easily, as shown by her (impulsive?) flight to Africa, which in turn tells us that her desire was to "disappear into the sunset.". The cat jumping into Jong-su's arms could have been completely coincidental. Now, the really big clue, for me was the watch, but Jong-su admitted that he won it in a drawing at a fair after he was told it was cheap by Hae-mi. I wonder if it held any significance to him, because he just gave it to her. I kinda got the feeling that this watch was not carefully examined by Jong-su, so the one he finds in Ben's drawer might not have been the same watch he gave to Hae-mi. Okay, the previous statement is stretching things, but let's say it was the watch. This is where I credit (of all things) Psy and Gangham Style video for explaining the social mentality of being poor in this particular part of Korea. I think everyone could agree that Ben's character was that of a rich playboy, and would be considered a good catch to young women, especially women that might want to capitalize on his wealth and social status. I am an American, but here, if a gal returns to your place for even a one night stand, and she wants to see you again, she might leave an article of clothing or jewelry. It is kind of a cute way of using the item as a pretext to see you again. Ben had a lot of trinkets in that drawer. Did he murder the owners of them all?
My point (finally!) is that Hae-mi could have just packed her bug out bag and got outta Dodge. In her mind, she had no attachments and no need to tell either man about where she went or why. To me, a sign of a great film is if the viewers could converse about the film for longer than the run time of said film. I was ready to go full neanderthal with a rage filled review saying it was a complete waste of time, too long, and nothing happens. I am so glad I read the reviews, because the revelations were myriad and I would have missed the point completely. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss this film with another audience member.
I will put on another pot of coffee, because the conversation will last way longer than the film's run time.
1 out of 4 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends