Vanessa Redgrave portrays an excellent Queen of Scots in this film; Mary Stuart's frivolity, passion for life, religious devotion, and emotion-stirring conscience is perfectly captured by this talented actress. Similarly, the vanity, arrogance, and evil self-assuredness of the weakling Henry Lord Darnley shone through in Timothy Dalton's words and actions. But, without desecrating the skills displayed by Dalton and Redgrave, I was riveted by the scenes in the English Court. Glenda Jackson, as Elizabeth of England, has completely captured the hearts and imaginations of the audience as the best actress to ever play the Virgin Queen, and as I watched her manipulate her Catholic enemies and rise above the snares of danger that her fellow Queen blindly stumbled into, I was amazed at her complete understanding of the role. In my opinion, Elizabeth can be no easy character to portray, but Jackson clearly demonstrates a clear knowledge of the complicated workings of this Queen's mind. Also wonderfully brought to life are the struggles for approval amongst her leading ministers, William Cecil (played by Trevor Howard) and Robert Dudley (Daniel Massey). Cecil's endless determination to lead the Queen in best interests of the nation are admirable, and Dudley's endless devotion (though sometimes portrayed as ambition and avarice) is touching. Unfortunately, the script seems to rush through the complicated and fascinating tale of the Queen of Scots' harrowing 7 years on her Scotch throne. All in all, I recommend this movie to anyone interested in Mary, or, even if your tastes run more to Elizabeth than her impulsive cousin, I believe you will be more than satisfied.
Reviews
3 Reviews
Lady Jane
(1986)
Historical and yet not for History Buffs
5 May 2002
"The next time I see your face, I want it for eternity." If you know much at all about Lady Jane Grey and her unfortunate marriage to Guildford Dudley, you must know this cannot at all be what she said to him as they were parted for the last time. Yet the story branches away from the historical aspects of Jane's life and builds up a romance completely created in the minds of the writers, who have done an excellent job. In the beginning, the scene at Bradgate in Leicester, with the dance for the King, is extremely well shot. The plot thickens between the cunning Earl of Northumberland and the cold, greedy Duchess of Suffolk, while Jane argues theology with the Catholic doctor. Comparing this with history, I believe this was also very well written; from what I've read on Jane Grey (I have done extensive Tudor period research) I know she was very Protestant and, unlike the later Queen Elizabeth, very willing to argue on the topic of religion. Perhaps my favorite scene in the entire movie is the one where Jane goes to visit the Princess Mary. In this scene the Renaissance class system is extremely well depicted. The outwardly friendly but rather sneaky nature the Princess' maid (I believe that is Lady Anne Wharton) conducts herself shows the "subservience of the lesser nobility"; the proud way Jane speaks to the maid shows what the upper nobility could do; and then the regal, majestic, icy cold way the Princess Mary enters the room and "embraces" her second-cousin is the perfect example of a Princess of two royal bloodlines. Later, the love that blooms between Guildford and Jane will, without a doubt, sweep you off your feet. If you've ever been in love, I guarantee you'll relive some fond memories there. Overall, an excellent movie and highly recommended.
Anne of the Thousand Days
(1969)
Gripping Story
22 April 2002
In truth, Anne Boleyn was a fascinating woman, and this movie clearly depicts her as such. In the beginning, seen in her furtive romance with Henry Percy and arguments with her parents, we see the rebellious and haughty girl, fresh from the French Court, displayed brilliantly. Then, just as the real Anne did 500+ years earlier, Bujold becomes a manipulative but majestic woman before the camera, holding Burton in her clenched fist and reaching out with her other hand for England. Later, when she fails to produce the longed-for Prince, she does a fantastic job as the cast-off wife, worrying for her daughter, resolutely facing her own tragic destiny. The other characters were also wonderfully portrayed; Henry's finicky nature but sincere scruples and deep affection are more than just acted (or so it seems) by Richard Burton; the proud, determined disposition of the Spanish Princess is very much alive in Irene Papas' role as Queen Katharine; and old, stealthy Wolsey and cunning Cromwell come to life out of the pages of history just as they have been described. My only complaint is that the film was not long enough to show much about the three-year marriage of King Henry and Queen Anne. After Elizabeth's birth, which happened in September of 1533, the movie goes immediately to Katharine of Aragon's death, which happened in January of 1536. Aside from a few misplaced dates, the story line is intriguing. I definitely recommend it.
Tell Your Friends