Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Brother (I) (2000)
A poignant crime drama with likable and well-drawn characters
27 April 2016
Exiled from Japan, Yamamoto, a member of the Yakuza, arrives in Los Angeles. Here, his brother is the leader of a small-time multi-racial gang, and Yamamoto encourages them to expand by taking over the local drug trade.

Brother really struck a chord with me because of what it shows regarding race relations. It shows something I believe in very deeply and that is when forming relationships (be it love or friendship) with people, their character and principles should be the prime consideration and race should not factor into it.

Why? One reason is that it makes more sense to affiliate with people based on character and principles rather than race, because character and principles can change but race cannot; if I refuse to be friends with a person of race X, then that person cannot ever be friends with me as long as he does not change his race. Additionally, if race is the prime consideration, then it is possible one may disregard or overlook positive qualities in a person to prevent the creation of a relationship with them, and even more dangerously, one may disregard negative character traits just so they can connect with someone.

These are not conjectures, rather they are observations I have made in the almost thirty years I've been alive. Unfortunately, they're observations I have made much too often, starting from my formative years all the way to the somewhat cynical adult I am now. It really hurts me to see people from two countries detest each other over something that happened between their respective countries decades ago, even though these individuals had nothing personally to do with that event. Heck, I've met many of these people, whose default position is that they hate individuals from a certain country.

Not often does a film come along that so eloquently speaks to me about issues that I care very much about. This is why I've somewhat unintentionally gone off on a tangent.

The Yakuza members in this film are portrayed as ruthless individuals who carry out despicable acts and have no qualms about murdering innocent people to fulfil their needs and the needs of their (Yakuza) brothers, thus it is rather ironic that they do have some admirable qualities. One of those is that they consider the brotherhood between Yakuza members to be of more importance than familial relations (that is meant to be the ideal). Having seen this in the movie, I cannot help but think how much better it would be if we could apply a similar principle to our dealings with the people we meet every day (for good causes, of course, not criminal!).

While many of the characters in this film are deeply flawed in many ways, such as the blind loyalty they show to their bosses, they are also shown to be very human. To pass the time, they play cards and basketball and various other games; they laugh and they make jokes; they give each other gifts; they have people they care about and they care about each other. Depictions of leisure time and activities to portray the humanity in characters we might traditionally hate is a great strength of Takeshi Kitano the director, and is present in his other films (Boiling Point and the masterpiece Sonatine come to mind). The resulting effect is that it is impossible to hate the characters, no matter how much you may want to.

As in all Kitano films, there is a lot of humour, including some laugh out loud moments, and none of it feels out of place. As well as humour, many of Kitano's other trademarks are present, including off-screen violence (although there is much on screen violence as well, some of it eye-watering), lingering shots that continue after the scene has ended and ellipses, which is the technique of jumping from one scene to another and leaving what happened in between to the imagination.

Regular Kitano collaborator, Joe Hisaishi, provides the score, and what a beautiful and pensive score it is. Someone who has not watched the film might feel the score would be out of place in a gangster film, however, it fits perfectly. As I write, the track "I love you… Aniki" is playing on my CD player, and thinking about the themes and characters in the film, I feel, at the risk of sounding unmanly, choked up.

Takeshi Kitano brings Japanese style and sensibility to a gangster film set in America, and this was, based on an interview, his intention. This decision works very well and results in a poignant crime drama with likable and well-drawn characters. I did not appreciate Kitano's work five years back, however, he is now one of my favourite directors. I have not yet seen all his films but out of the ones I have, I highly recommend Kikujiro, Sonatine, Hana-Bi, Violent Cop, Dolls, Boiling Point and Zatoichi. I urge you to seek out and watch them, as well as Brother, of course.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Compelling and convincing; a chilling and believable film
26 April 2016
Two film-makers shooting a documentary on conspiracy theories soon find themselves out of their depth.

Judging from the cover of the DVD, I was expecting another generic found-footage film with elements of a slasher movie, however, not since the paranoia films of the 70s (such as those directed by Alan J. Pakula) has a conspiracy film frightened me as much as this film did. In fact, I was more frightened than I normally am these days when watching most horror films. The style of this movie is a mix of pseudo-documentary and found footage styles, however, it is many times more convincing than the ones I have seen so far in the latter genre. Though it may not hearken to the classic 70s conspiracy thrillers in terms of its aesthetics, it certainly does so in spirit and in the extent to which it very effectively induces paranoia.

The events in the film are given credence by the initial set-up, which references many real-life world events and conspiracy theories, such as JFK's assassination, 9/11 and World War One. The film asks and attempts to answer some of the questions regarding with whom power really resides, how much influence and control "they" have, and reasons for the methods "they" employ. One aspect chillingly realised is the extent to which "they" can manipulate not just what we see and hear but also how we see and hear it. The film shows how powerless we really are, at least as individuals, in the faces of these monumental positions of power; you'll be fine if you conform but anyone who dares to question will be dealt with. The film also asks how much freedom we have in society- are we truly free?

A very strong element in the film is the score by Darren Baker, which is instrumental in creating an atmosphere of horror and dread. The score incorporates an organ (in certain sequences, the organ actually provides additional emotional depth), some very loud and ominous-sounding horns, and something which is reminiscent of an air-raid siren. I am listening to the score as I write this piece, and it does not lose its power outside of the film. It makes me long to watch the film again, and it has not even been 24 hours since I first watched it!

The Conspiracy is utterly compelling and convincing, a chilling and believable film with much plausibility, a film which elicits a visceral as well as an intellectual response from its witnesses. Even if you don't subscribe to conspiracy theories, you just might find yourself being carried away by what this film proposes.

Note: I would not be surprised if any/all proposed conspiracy theories are (ever) proved to be true. I find what is proposed in this film truly terrifying, however, one thought comforts me: the world will end one day, regardless of whether you look at it from a religious or scientific point of view. These powerful people and the rest of us will all be dust. When you think of it like this, these so called powerful people truly pale in significance. They are not powerful after all. None of us are.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
In Bruges (2008)
A dark film imbued with much humour, pathos and humanity. Excellent!
7 April 2016
Hit men Ray and Ken have been told to lay low and await orders in Bruges, a city in Belgium, after a job gone wrong. While Ken is happy to relax and sightsee, Ray could not be unhappier. Of course, aside from the fact that Ray does not care for the cultural offerings of their surroundings, he is also dealing with past wrongdoings that play heavily on his conscience.

While this may sound like the makings of a dour story (not that there's anything wrong with dour stories; I love them), I do not think any film has made me sad and then laugh in immediate succession without devolving into parody. This movie may be the only one that has, and does so more than once. Indeed, I sometimes laughed whilst I was sad, and rather than the integrity of the scene being ruined, I was confounded; should I be laughing or crying? I say "without devolving into parody" because some films unintentionally make light of the more downbeat moments, thus detracting from them. In Bruges does not fall into this trap. Yes, the film can be classified as a black comedy and yes, much of the (often very dark) humour is amongst the funniest I've come across in my time watching films. However, the more serious portions of the film, which mostly deal with Ray's struggle with his guilt, are truly sincere and heartfelt.

Colin Farrell gives a truly great performance. He makes it easy to sympathise with Ray; you really feel sorry for him. It seems to me that Farrell generally is not given the respect he deserves as an actor. This maybe more a reflection of the roles he chooses rather than his ability. If you don't like Colin Farrell, watch In Bruges and maybe you'll change your mind.

Brendan Gleeson, as always, is excellent as the older Ken. Ken may be a hit-man but it's hard to believe due to his warm, amiable and gentle nature. At the same time, Gleeson also manages to bring a certain gravity to the role; notwithstanding his trade, Ken could very well be a role model for a young man, at least in terms of his mannerisms. Ken is like a father figure to Ray; he genuinely cares for Ray's wellbeing.

The foul-mouthed character of Harry- Ray's and Ken's boss- is played by, well, I won't say; if you do not know already, it's better to find out when you watch the film. Perhaps you'll be surprised. Even though we only hear Harry over the phone for the first half or more of the film, he exudes a strong presence.

None of the main characters (I refer to Ray, Ken and Harry) are truly despicable; yes, they've committed evil deeds and are deeply flawed, however, they all have their principles (many of them actually honourable) and stick to them. This instils respect in one's heart for the characters, if not unreserved love (but how can you not love Ken?).

The film also looks very good. The night-time scenes in particular stand out, especially the ones with fog. You might say "it's like a… fairy-tale or something".

Last but not least is the dark and pensive score by Carter Burwell, which exemplifies the themes of guilt and redemption and really underscores Ray's anguish. Burwell is fast becoming one of my favourite composers.

In Bruges is a dark film imbued with much humour, pathos and humanity. It succeeds because of its characters. It is one of my favourite films, and I hope you feel the same after watching it.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed