Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Should have waited for Brian Singer...
7 November 2006
Imagine it like this. You leave your home in the hands of a friend while you're away on holiday. You come back, the kitchen has burnt down, the pets are dead and what used to be upstairs is now a makeshift Gazebo in your front lawn.

Ratner did not have the investment of Singer or the fans in this film and he did not treat it with the respect it deserved.

He dropped an immensely well acted and favoured character from the series.

He took Joss Whedon's premise and did it himself, never a good start - Alien Resurrection anyone?

The plot is mangled and nonsensical.

He then took liberties and leaps with the characters he had no right to. So drastic that it is now almost impossible for anyone to reassemble the pre-X3 franchise in any sensible way.

He didn't understand the relationships between the characters and didn't try to. These are not the characters that we left in X2. The effects are cool, there are some neat moments but there is none of the emotional resonance or connection with the characters the other films had. He sacrificed what could have been great for the sake of a poorly done "shock" moment and some cool effects that will age quickly.

Watch, if only to see and learn why sometimes it is best to wait for a genius than hire a stand in.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Robin Hood (2006–2009)
7/10
BBC family TV is back!
7 November 2006
A modern take on a very old story.

As every generation has adapted and interpreted Robin Hood to their own situation, so has ours. The metaphors here are…well, let's say subtlety is not something this program does well. Although to be fair, they're clearly not aiming for it.

What they are aiming for is a fun, enjoyable and entertaining program that everyone can understand. They don't have the technique of creating a level of seriousness or complexity aimed at adults the way Russell T Davies' Doctor Who does. What they have done, and done well is to make it with such a wry sense of humour that makes it very enjoyable. It's a very self aware program, they don't try to stop being obvious or silly, instead they do it in a way that makes you smile.

It's not without merit either. It would have been very easy to turn this into a boy's club and have Marian the helpless woman, swooning over the hero. Oh, no. Marian is not impressed with Robin and she has as much grounds to claim the title "hero" as he does, she may even be that little bit better.

Robin is a brave and flawed character. Much, mainly the comic relief, is played with such a broken innocence by Sam Troughton that - when you don't want to hit him for his repetitive lines, which the kids will love - you just want to hug him. The Sheriff of Nottingham is in no way anything other than a villain pure and simple. He is however immensely fun and has some cracking liners that will go right over kid's heads and have you laughing.

Mildly predictable in the warm BBC family TV way, which is just what has been missing from our screens for so long. Sit down with the family and enjoy it for what it is - a fun, enjoyable family series courtesy of Auntie Beeb.
5 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Finally! My generations Indiana Jones.
20 June 2006
Yes, yes, yes! A gorgeous swashbuckling rouge, pirates, monsters, a damsel not so much in distress and a monkey. How could anyone resist it? One of the most entertaining films i've ever watched. It's smart, funny, engaging, exciting and it's fun! One of the rare films where you are actually taken on adventure.

You admire and love Jack, you feel sympathy for the villains. You want to be a part of this world. It somehow manages to touch the child looking for adventure in everyone. A film you can watch again and again and again...

Capt. Jack Sparrow takes a podium on the eternal hall of fame for heroes and his adventures I imagine will endure as long as Indy's.

Bring me that horizon!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A hell of a lot better than I expected.
20 June 2006
I refused to watch this when it came out. I thought it was a terrible, terrible idea, "The Scorpion King" of the Alien franchise. I was wrong.

I've never seen the Predator films but I love Alien, Aliens, don't mind Alien 3 and detest Alien Resurrection.

Back is the feminist theme, a keystone of the franchise that disappeared in Resurrection. The Predators are cool, as are the Aliens vs. Predator fights. It looks cool - the design, the fx, the weapons, the aliens, the predators, the sets.

It's a fairly cool film. More in line with Aliens than any of the other Alien films. Only one real creepy moment, the rest is hack and slash action but certainly a worthy addition to the Alien franchise, their best attempt since Aliens. Not too intelligent but not plain out dumb, its enjoyable and easy to watch.
4 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
MI1 meets MI2.
20 June 2006
Some spectacular stunts, a villain with a laconic cool and a great comic relief in Simon Pegg. Not too intelligent but not insultingly mindless either.

Some franchises get worse as they go on. Others get better. Rarely do they get worse, then pick themselves up by the scruff of the neck and combine the best parts of its predecessors to create a great installment. MI3 is a rare occurrence.

Not as smart or character driven as MI1. Not as stupid or spectacular as MI2. It's a good compromise between the two.

MI3 is an improvement on MI2, keeping the blockbuster status but making it smarter and more...well, realistic. In a totally impossible sense.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stargate: Atlantis (2004–2009)
Flaunts its potential in its premier and by mid season has firmly established itself as far superior to Stargate SG:1.
28 October 2005
I think one of the things that makes Atlantis feel so genuine and hence so interesting is it's treatment of minor characters. The focus is on the first Atlantis team but compared to SG1 the secondary characters get quite a deal of development and there are quite a few of them. Most notably:

Paul McGillion plays Dr Carson Beckett, a frequently recurring character whose wit, exasperation and dislike of gate travel and anything related to the ancient technologies is wonderful as the Scottish Chief Medical Officer.

Czech engineer Dr. Radek Zelenka - it takes one scene in "38 minutes" for David Nykl to make Zelenka endearing and subsequent screen time seems inevitable and anticipated. He just as quickly adds more character in his few minutes than others have with dominant screen time.His scenes with Rodney McKay are one of the gems of Stargate Atlantis.

Other minor characters such as Peter Grodin, Dr Kavanagh, Sgt Bates and even lesser characters leave an impression and are part of what gives the series its texture. It begins to feel like its real. That beyond the expeditions of the primary team there is a whole city full of people from all over the world, each with their own story, striving to bring Atlantis to life.

Of course, that's not say it doesn't have it's little…wobbles. Every show trying to find it's feet has shaky moments, Atlantis is no exception. They do succumb to the urge to cover cliché plots from every other sci-fi show ever shown but these occurrences are limited. One of them even acknowledging it with a few remarks about Kirk from Star Trek in such a way that you're almost willing to forgive them for it.

The character of Teyla(Rachel Luttrel) however is something that I'm not prepared to forgive them for yet. Clearly an attempt at a female Teal'c equivalent for SA:1 the character has no depth, in my opinion is there simply to be looked at. She's also very annoying.

Lt Aiden Ford (Rainbow Sun Francks) spent the entire season being very boring.

I feel Torri Higginson's character, Dr Elizabeth Weir, does have a lot of potential in her but its not something that's been greatly explored yet. It does look as if they're building up to something with her though. A strong, female civilian leader for Atlantis was a wonderful idea and is very nice to see.

Dr Rodney McKay becomes a wonderful character, going from the irritating git you want to deck, to the irritating git that despite yourself you love. One of the most interesting and yet exasperating characters with the everyman "Run away!" reaction he's portrayed wonderfully by David Hewlett who takes full advantage of a chance to shine and develops very well.

Our resident hero, Major John Sheppard (Joe Flanigan) was not someone I took to at first, although I found he grew on me. After mid-season episodes "The Storm" and "The Eye" I was pleased to say I liked him. He was also very cool. Whether this was just me or some intentional build up I don't know but it worked very well.

"The Storm" and "The Eye" were very good episodes and had great character plays from Dr. Rodney Mckay and Dr Elizabeth Weir as well. Teyla was annoying. Ford too. I don't think anyone can fail to love Beckett for his comments to Ford.

Unlike Stargate SG:1, the majority of relationships in Atlantis are hinted at, alluded to, suggested of not trampled over and dealt with with all the subtlety of the self destruct system. This also allows for the potential pairings of a number of different characters which while it would lead down the soap-opera road if they dared follow it creates a lot of layers of interest for fans.

"Letters from Pegasus" is in essence a flashback episode such as Stargate SG:1 torture us with every so often the result usually leaving us feel cheated of an episode. Atlantis' version doesn't. The idea behind the episode itself is rather sweet, they use it to advance character development and keep you entertained throughout. It is entirely an episode in itself, interspersed with some definitive moments from the earlier episodes. Bravo.

"The Siege" Parts 1 and 2 are the season finale and what a finale they are. They contain something that Stargate SG:1 has not managed to pull off in a long time - suspense. There is a genuine feel of danger here and while you know they're going to get out of it you really, really, really want to know how they're going to do it in the "Siege Part 3" next season. They're also clever enough to add just the right incidents to add a distinct fear and make you question what is going to happen. You know fine well they must survive but exactly who will survive and at what cost is a question that genuinely floats through the viewers mind. It's also at this point you realise that not only is the plot brilliant but that you don't want these characters to die.

There isn't the deep love that men like Joss Whedon can create from his audience towards his characters but there is the care and concern towards them that many programmes simply lack. Any care still felt for SG:1 is really don't to being accustomed to them. In Stargate Atlantis it's because they've managed to interest you. To keep you entertained and intrigued. You don't know what's going to happen next and you want to. For once you actually give a damn about characters from the Stargate universe. So way to go Stargate Atlantis. Very well done, let's hope it stays that way.

Oh, and the Wraith? The plot motivations the entire series is based upon? Far creepier than the Goa'uld ever were. You know from the first glance they're going to be cool and creepy. See for yourself.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Disappointingly done.
6 September 2005
This is a wonderful concept and to be honest whose interest couldn't be picked by such a cracking title as "God the Devil and Bob." Sadly, the most remarkable thing about this programme is the utter sense of disappointment and anticlimax it inspires.

There are a number of glimmering gems of ideas buried in this programme but so deeply disguised and poorly done that you can't help feel it was a disaster they tried to do them at all. It would have been better if they'd just left it for someone else to do well.

Some of the dialogue itself seems good but is so poorly delivered and with such bad timing they don't even register as amusing. There's not even one point in the whole thing that really cracks a genuine smile. The characters are flat, the music annoying the sentiment painful.

The only vaguely redeeming feature of this programme is Alan Cumming as the Devil. His vulnerable, do-you-really-love-me tone of voice during some of his conversations with God is wonderful.

I expected this to be the snappy, quirky, satirical programme it looked to be. If you are expecting the same thing save yourself the disappointment and don't watch. Sad to say, it's really not worth it.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Alan Rickman shines. Shame about the rest of the film...
27 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
(Contains one very mild spoiler.) This is a very difficult film to rate. Essentialy because it feels as if you are watching two different films.

The first stars Alan Rickman. It is brilliant, its funny, entertaining and captivating, mainly due to Alan Rickman himself.

The second is terrible. It involves Kevin Costner trampling all over one of the best loved characters of British folk lore. He comes across as rather lame overall, lacking the strength and emotional resonance that Robin Hood should have.

As much as I love siding with the antagonist as Alan Rickman often entices us to do, it simply shouldn't be that way in a Robin Hood film. Kevin Costner as Robin Hood comes across poorly on his own let alone juxtaposed with such a strong performance from Alan Rickman.

No Robin Hood film should ever be a film where you want the Sheriff of Nottingham to stab Robin Hood to death, preferably as Alan Rickman suggests with a spoon. Yet it is.

So yes, if you want to watch Alan Rickman in a great performance do watch this film. It is worth it in that respect. Just be prepared to put up with a poor performance from Kevin Costner.

This is not a good Robin Hood film, but it is a good Alan Rickman film.
19 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed