Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
Terrible
12 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie yesterday on the TV and I really need to write a review. I am not a big Star Trek fan. I used to watch the Next Generation series when I was a child and found it very interesting. Lately I saw the original series and found it very naive. I also remember Star Trek: The Motion Picture, as a great movie, with superb music, nice philosophical problems and a climate similar to the masterpiece of 2001: Space Odyssey. So when I saw a new Star Trek starting on TV I decided to give it a try. It must be fun. I was wrong.

Well I don't really want to describe the whole plot. The movie is so ridiculous to me, that I would waste half a day to describe everything. At the beginning we see the Enterprise flying thousands of light years to collect parts of a droid (which then of course will turn out to be very important to the plot). Can you imagine that in current reality? I mean a captain of a warship sailing to the other side of the Earth just to collect some parts of a broken computer? Then we see some diplomacy and trickery, but this is so naive and unbelievable that reminds me only of the original series. But that was made in the 60's, and now we have XXI century! The final fight is really terrible. Please compare it to the Klingon raid on VGER's cloud in the Motion Picture. In Nemesis we see ships flying around, doing some random shooting etc. No emotions. We are watching this and thinking when it will end. It seems that being hit by a torpedo is not dangerous because it could destroy the ship, but rather because passengers could be killed from flying around the cabin. Haven't they designed seat belts yet? I also cannot understand how being hit in the engines could cause production of sparks on the bridge... Another thing - if it is so easy to board an enemy ship in that reality, why aren't there any safety systems like sentries or force-shields inside? Anyway - compare it to the Star Wars IV opening scene, where we also see boarding of an enemy ship. Is it comparable at all? Nemesis reminds me more of boys playing paint ball rather than regular war. Why can't Enterprise discover a ship which is cloaked? I thought that they have most sophisticated hardware on board. I would expect them to think of something, maybe design a detector or so. Nope - they will use telepathy... aghrr. OK I've had it. I really cannot image how can Nemesis have higher rating here than The Motion Picture. But if other Star Trek movies are more similar to Nemesis than to TMP, then the whole series must be a real crap. Sorry.

I give it 3/10, because there still are (really!) movies worse than that.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not as good as the classical Aliens, but still a bit underrated
11 September 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Alien: Resurrection is much different than classical Aliens. As a result many Alien-maniacs are disappointed and give it bad notes in the reviews. In my opinion one should look at the movie in a different way. It is not a clear continuation of the story, but rather a variation on the subject.

Alien 4 is not perfect, not even great, but still it is a good science fiction movie. The story is very well written. Many people criticize the idea of cloning Ripley along with the alien inside. Of course I agree that this is completely naive and unrealistic (even the general asks how it is possible), but we have to accept this as a convention. There was no other way to have Ripley back in Alien 4. Well I can imagine Ripley waking up and saying 'Hey, it was just a dream, I didn't jump into the burning lead', but this would be even more ridiculous to me. In Star Wars for example there are many naive and unrealistic things but it doesn't stop it from being a great movie. We accept them just as a convention.

Other people note that Alien 4 is not scary at all. I agree. But I still think that it wasn't supposed to be very scary. In Alien 1&2 Ripley was scared as hell and so were we. In Alien 3 she wasn't scared as much, as she knew from a point, that the Alien wouldn't kill her. We were not scared that much either. In Resurrection Ripley is not scared at all, as she is a bit of alien herself. Why should we be scared then? In my opinion this confusion, whether Ripley is more a human or a alien and who to chose, is the best feature of the movie. It is not a pure action but also a bit of psychological drama. The newborn alien is a masterpiece to me. Ripley, who has strong maternal instinct (see Aliens) feels that it has some of her DNA, that it is her own child. She has real doubts whether to kill it or not. And what is even more interesting is that she probably kills it only to save Annalee. I think she would not kill it just to save a human, which were shown in the movie as beings not really better than the aliens themselves. She did it to save the robot, who in her opinion was probably much more of worth. And that is how I actually felt while watching the movie. "The newborn alien is so cute, maybe let him kill those freaking human beings." But then I would be sorry for Annalee...

In my opinion this is a very good movie, with nice climate and many philosophical questions asked. But if you care only for good action or horror, then you might be disappointed.
55 out of 61 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed