Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Star Wars: Rebels: The Forgotten Droid (2016)
Season 2, Episode 19
10/10
"If this is filler..."
21 May 2023
Anymore I've been coming to IMDb after each episode with a full heart ready to see the middling scores and complaints of "filler."

If you're like me, and the journey is a key part of the magic, the pieces that comprise the whole, the connections that allow for the bigger episodes to deliver their payoff, then an episode like this is one of the best.

I let it in. I wanted to spend as much time with Chopper and AP-5 as possible. I marveled at watching the Ghost and Shadowcaster fight together. I drooled over the design of the depot station and cargo ship. And I grinned the entire time from the comedic timing of this wonderful food.

So, yeah. If this is filler then load up my plate.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Wars: Rebels: The Call (2016)
Season 2, Episode 15
9/10
Beautiful Episode
20 May 2023
I know the best is yet to come. I know there are two more seasons. Every time I come to IMDb to learn more about these episodes, though, I'm continually shocked by the mediocre scores and use of "filler" in the reviews. My friends, if this is filler to you then you don't understand the beauty of a television series.

Especially in retrospect, after seeing the excitement in reaction videos from people seeing the purrgil in The Mandalorian, I got super excited as soon as I heard the whale song. The visuals, character moments, and actions scenes were fantastic. The purrgil retrieving Ezra's helmet was touching.

Other episodes to come may be the true 10-star entries, but this one for me earns 10-stars for providing the wonder and quiet moments that stick to the ribs and make this series so special.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Wars: Rebels: Legends of the Lasat (2016)
Season 2, Episode 14
10/10
Oh Captain, My Captain Zeb
18 May 2023
This is my first time through Rebels, and this episode really sneaked up on me. By the time we reach the climactic scene that many have mentioned, I was completely engrossed and found myself teary eyed. It was the perfect blend of character, story, visuals, and score. I want to find that track. I want that backdrop painting.

Diving into Zeb's history for the first time this episode gives him much-needed depth and reminded me of learning about Worf's Klingon culture in TNG.

I'm looking forward to finishing Rebels before Ahsoka airs. It's been an amazing ride so far, and I've heard the best is yet to come.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Chrysalis (I) (2014)
9/10
Rich characterization and beautiful photography set this film apart.
19 May 2014
After a screening of Chrysalis, a friend asked me if I liked the horror film genre. That question sparked the perfect place to begin this review, because I've never been a genre-specific film-goer. Generally speaking, though, I don't like modern horror films and tend to avoid them because they're predictable, lack characterization, and celebrate gore more than good writing. My favorite horror films are slower paced. They don't need gore to tell me that something is horrific. Tension is more important than spectacle.

Written by Ben Kurstin and directed by John Klein, the story centers almost exclusively on three characters, Josh (Cole Simon) and Penelope (Sara Gorsky), who are partners, and Abira (Tanya Thai McBride), whom they meet toward the beginning of the film, who promises to lead them to a settlement of people, i.e., relative safety. They are survivors in a post- apocalyptic world who have known nothing but the search for food and shelter. Murderous, zombie-like cannibals roam the landscape and are a constant threat. One of the delights of the plot is the way it unfolds its internal history organically through the characters as they proceed, so I won't spoil the details here.

Chrysalis is remarkable in that it stridently avoids the pitfalls of its genre. It is primarily a character study in a survival setting. In this way, it reminded me less of a zombie movie and more of The Grey, in which a pack of wolves pursue a band of plane crash survivors. What the threat is specifically isn't as important as its presence, its driving force, its relentlessness. But, since it will be classified as a "zombie movie," it's refreshing to report that the cannibals in Chrysalis aren't monsters; they're human. Their humanity and loss of it haunts the main characters. This is how zombie-type characters are used best, when they force us to examine what makes us human.

The the sense of dread is established early in the film, and the story maintains it throughout, growing it, nurturing it, so that the moments of action become cathartic payoffs. As Hitchcock would say, tension comes from wondering what's around the next corner, not seeing what's there. This let me care about these characters and what happens to them. Impressively, the action has consequences when it does come, which is unheard of in most horror films. These people are repulsed by the violence surrounding them. They have accepted it as a means of survival, but they aren't desensitized to it. They feel it, so the audience feels it. The filmmakers had many opportunities where they could have exploited the blood and violence. Instead, they used it sparingly, strategically. Much of the violence happens out of frame and is sold through context and sound effects, which allows the audience to manufacture far more evocative images than special effects could.

The heart of this movie is a touching love story. Josh and Penelope move together seamlessly in the way only a couple that has been together a long time can. They help each other make sense of this world. They are each other's anchors, and they fight to ensure they don't lose a sense of whimsy or the appreciation of beauty wherever it can be found in such a desolate, ugly landscape. They hope to have a child someday, which feels awfully selfish in their environment – why would anybody want to bring a baby into that world? – but this is their world, not ours.

Simon and Gorsky look hollow yet strong enough to take care of themselves. He is their tactician and muscle; she is their heart and reason for pressing forward to somewhere, anywhere, in the search of a better place to live. This is a dark and dreary world, yet the actors shine through it in an honest way, never grandstanding. You would mistake them as a crusty part of the landscape if not for their persistence and charm.

Abira is both instantly likable and suspicious. There are obvious advantages to joining her, but trust is a rare commodity here. The genius of the film is that the audience is allowed the time to ally with Josh and Penelope and their struggle before Abira is introduced, so that we empathize with their curiosity and their caution. In a sense, this becomes the central conflict in the story, and it's handled beautifully. McBride's eyes twinkle with wisdom and sadness, like pools you fear may be too deep. When I imagined myself in their situation, I didn't know whether I would run toward her or away from her.

Another of the film's surprises was the photography. Establishing and tracking shots, like a beautifully composed vista, or an intimate, dripping still life, let the crumbling buildings and exposed rebar swallow the characters whole. Trees reached up like dead fingers. Darkened doorways beckoned and warned. This is a beautifully shot film whose images linger long after the lights come up.
30 out of 79 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Thank Goodness for This Movie.
14 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The Premise: Recovering addict is released from rehab in time to attend her sister's wedding.

In other hands, this would be a chick flick that horribly underplays its content, enough to insult it, in favor of light-hearted moments between cookie cutter characters. In Jonathan Demme's hands, it becomes an enveloping experience that pulled me into a very real situation, almost documentary style, with flares of Demme's friend and mentor Robert Altman. The performances are astounding and led by the addict played by Anne Hathaway. Every review, except for one that I'll discuss, heralds her turn as Kym. She is remarkable. It isn't a character she simply slips on and plays. I don't who she has known or what experiences she's had that informed her decisions, but she presents a whole, fractured girl who we simultaneously love, pity, and loathe.

Not everyone knows somebody like Kym. Outsiders may have a hard time dealing with the character, just as people in real life can't understand an addict or someone with a mental disorder until they've attempted to learn, love, grow, and deal with them in everyday, human terms. It's not something that can be wished away. Some people have diabetes or a missing limb. Mental disorders and addictions are imbalances or missing puzzle pieces in the brain, and those who have to deal with them can be just as disabled or enabled as someone missing a leg. Because the affliction isn't readily visible or "practical," it can lead to many moments of heartache and frustration.

The rest of the cast is superb. Debra Winger comes out of retirement every once in a while, and I'm assured that any time she decides to it's because the script presented to her intrigues and challenges her. She rises to it as Kym and Rachel's mother. Just when I was wondering what hoops she would jump through with this character, she tore it apart as only Debra Winger can, and it's stunning.

This is a rare kind of movie that seems to enjoy subtly playing with our expectations of traditional film conventions. The camera revolves around the car Kym gets into to leave rehab. Someone asks her if there is anyone left behind she needs to say good-bye to, and the camera swings into its final place before a reflective window, where in a typical film we'd see the image of a boy she's leaving behind. In this film the window is empty, Kym says, "Fuck no," and they drive off. Another example: will Kym hook up with the best man, who happened to be in her first rehab meeting? The solution is immediate and gray. Some things just aren't explained.

Nor do the story or characters unfold linearly. They reveal themselves through carefully constructed moments. That's what I would call the scenes; they are specific moments throughout the course of a few days that we are party to as guests or as a silent observer over Kym's shoulder. We are told or shown what we need to know through these moments, which requires thought, attentiveness, and translation by the viewer. Imagine! Some critics complained that it meandered too much, felt too unstructured, but I believe that to be the magic of every component: the script, the direction, the camera work, and the performances. Most critics spend a lot of time bemoaning typical Hollywood fare, and it boggles my mind to read the 13% of reviews on Rotten Tomatoes that complained about this one when it should have been the answer to their prayers.

Which brings me to the one critic I read who said that Anne Hathaway works best as a fantasy princess. That line was enough for me to question his credibility, because her work here is indisputable. The rest of his review has a conservative bias, and it angered me, especially after the presidential election, because the word conservative is being used increasingly as a shield for fundamentally insular or bigoted people so can lob derision upon any group that doesn't share their incredibly stable view of life. "I'm allowed to fire and forget; I'm conservative!" This film knits a beautiful, varied, dense tapestry of music, races, religious beliefs, and mental states without ever passing judgment or, in many cases, acknowledging the diversity. It exists as the status quo, and I'm sure that would make many conservatives uncomfortable.

Thank goodness for this movie.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Front of the Class (2008 TV Movie)
8/10
Beautiful Family Film
8 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I normally don't watch Hallmark films. Seeing this last night may have changed my outlook on them, though it was too bad it was broadcast after my daughter was in bed. I'd love for her to see it on DVD.

This is the true story of a young man, Brad Cohen, with Tourette syndrome who wants to become a teacher and get his master's degree. It's a very simple story made magical and engaging by the strength of its leading player, James Wolk. I hope to see more of him in other work soon. His ability to capture the helplessness of Tourette's while burning through it with his heart and charm is remarkable.

The story divides its time between Brad's struggles in everyday life with his disorder, attempting to get the teaching position, his relationships with his family, students, and new girlfriend. The script is a bit Hallmark-heavy-handed at times, but it comes with the brand. This *is* a greeting card company, after all.

The supporting cast is wonderful. Sarah Drew is every boy's crush as Brad's new girlfriend. Treat Williams is powerful and sympathetic as Brad's father. I highly recommend this film for great family viewing full of life lessons and love.
14 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Smallville: Prey (2008)
Season 8, Episode 6
10/10
All he needs now is the suit and the power of flight.
24 October 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I had a geekgasm watching this episode. While last week's trailer promised more Doomsday (did I miss the scene when Chloe discusses how this new creature can kill Clark?), the beginning moments of "Prey" arrived as the quiet fruition of seven seasons of solid character development.

A few stinker episodes and story arcs aside, this series has been built on a solid foundation of its characters, especially in the parallel evolution of Clark, Lex, and Chloe. Now that Lex, Lionel, the Kents, and Lana are gone, we see Clark more isolated and establishing himself as an adult. More and more, through costume choices, dialog, and Tom Welling's presence and delivery, he has become Superman. It's been a wonderfully slow and logical progression that simply can't be accomplished in any other media like it can in long-running serial television. There isn't a cheesy "moment" or "even" when he decides to become Superman. It's been built up with great skill and purpose from Season One through everything that has happened to him. His relationships, his decisions, and his mistakes have shaped him to be the hero we're expecting. I applaud the show.

These accolades come from watching Clark in the beginning of this episode. He's listening to the police scanner and responding to calls. We get an amazing downward aerial shot of the streets of Metropolis as his red and blue streak travels about the city. We're treated to a couple of Richard-Donner-Superman "first night" moments, when Clark is rescuing people not because they're tied to this episode's plot line, but because he's a hero and they need rescuing. I was giddy. Without fanfare or advertising, Smallville has introduced Superman in a very real way.

Chloe and Clark's relationship continues to sparkle. Allison Mack is a treasure, and I frankly can't wait to see where her career goes once she's free of the show. She brings so much depth and subtlety to her scenes that she often covers the writers' butts. She can make the cheesiest moments feel genuine.

My favorite dialog was between Clark and John Jones (sorry, I don't know the DC spelling) regarding keeping his identity secret. I'm very curious to see how the writers are going to handle the transition from anonymous hero to globally-known Superman without anyone realizing that it's Clark, especially now that he's established in Metropolis and *gasp!* without his glasses.

Of course, we all just sort of accept it in every other incarnation, so in a way we can't apply logic only to Smallville. Still, I have a feeling that they have something clever and deeply character-based up their sleeves, or at least some kind of gimmick we weren't expecting.

Great episode. And I didn't even talk about the plot.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
No Movie Like This Movie
28 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Twelve years after Rent debuted on Broadway and swept across the consciousness of multiple generations (I'm in X), the curtain closed a final time in the theater on 41st St. That night was a culmination of Larson's realized, unrealized dream, witnessed by his parents and sister, and celebrated by the lucky hundreds in attendance that night. After the disappointment of Christopher Columbus's noble attempt, we finally have a definitive version of the musical to remember it by. This is it. This is the one.

All I could think, through laughter and tears, was "How much money did they spend to make that Hollywood version when all they needed to do was THIS? Set up a camera crew in the Nederlander theater and capture the show as it was intended to be seen."

Roger never sings from atop a butte here. :)

I'm sure there will be a selection of fans who were never able to see the show on Broadway or on tour who first loved the Columbus film and it's soundtrack (it's a great soundtrack, after all) and won't understand this Filmed on Broadway version without the context of being there. But, if you've never seen either version I suggest starting here. And for those of us who have seen it live, once or many times, here it is in a time capsule.

I appreciate the closeups. In the movie theater today, I wanted the crew to pull back a bit and show us the entire stage and staging more often. That's my only gripe and why I rate it a 9 out of 10. Then, I think about it on the small screen in your living room and how tiny the stage would look at that size and understand. This version is meant to take the experience home.

The bricks of the wall at the back of the stage, up where Mimi comes out to play? You can see their texture. I imagined the hands of every girl who played Mimi caressing their surfaces and thought, "We've never seen that before, not so close." The overlapping chorus of Angel buying Collins his coat, Roger introducing Mimi to Mark, and Joanne talking to Maureen on the phone has never been clearer, thanks to the camera cuts. The close-up of Angel as she's leaving the stage in death was beautiful.

The best testament to how well this transported me came afterward. My girlfriend and I walked out of the local cineplex fully immersed in Manhattan. It was jarring to see the trees of the suburbs and not the towers, noise, people, and cabs of the Theatre District. I drove away expecting the City's traffic, maybe a bridge, but we suddenly found ourselves in our hometown. So sad. I was hoping to stop at Grimaldi's.
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Ignorance
10 April 2006
This comment is both a review of the film and a response to the comment left by "braindog."

The review aspect exists in the depth of the following argument. The issues raised by the film are painfully highlighted by braindog's comments.

Dear "Braindog,"

I went through a range of emotions as I read your comment on Twist of Faith. It began with anger, then disbelief, and finally pity. No, not pity for you. I don't know you at all. I feel pity for the endless line of children who are being sexually abused or will be in the years to come. A war on child sex abuse is like the war on terror or drugs; complete victory isn't possible, but that doesn't mean we stop fighting. Comments like yours are sheltered, insensitive, and dangerous. I pity the children who will be harmed because of a mindset like yours. The pedophile's best weapons come from other people. The public's silence, ignorance, and fear speaking against the popular view let pedophiles hide and endure because people won't attack child sex abuse head-on.

How old are you? How would you react if an authority figure, trusted, loved, friendly, advanced on you when you were 15? It's easier in today's instant-message, on-demand, Internet-savvy world to dismiss the filmmakers' stories. It is harmful to think that because teens "know" about sex that they are mature enough to make the right decisions or have the strength to make sense of an insane reality, even today when sex and teens are synonymous in pop culture.

Do you know the filmmakers? Do you know their families, go to their churches, attend their schools? I did. The film showed you the new reports, the testimonials, the tears, and the arraignments. What more did you want from it? This is a documentary, not a work of fiction.

When you're older and perhaps have a teen-aged child of your own, maybe you'll begin to understand how young they are, how impressionable and vulnerable they are. You comments sickened me. They are children, and they need to be protect. And they need to be believed.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The Saga Is Complete
23 May 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The film itself was wonderful, haunting, relentless, and an instant classic despite its few failings. I ignore the critics who lambaste the acting. I roll my eyes at the critics bent on the George Bush agenda. Lucas wrote this story 30 years ago. While not scripted then, the targeted lines could be linked to any administration, hence its timelessness. Look at the poll here and it's clear: The naysayers should just stay at home.

What I Liked: The entire opening sequence. This segment of the film had everything good about Star Wars: The best effects we've seen in long, purposeful shots. Brining R2 to life. Anakin and Obi-Wan working together as warriors and friends as we needed to see according to Alec Guinness' account of their relationship. Anakin as a great star pilot. Jedi action that was human and spectacular.

Ian McDiarmid. He is a blessing to these films. I LOVED him in this film. The mask no longer needed, he is cackling and gleeful in his glory. What I liked is that they portrayed him still as a bit of a coward, albeit a powerful one. Mace Windu's death and his transformation thrilled me. His fight with Yoda was of the epic proportions it needed, essentially two gods fighting each other. "Do not underestimate the power of the Emperor," Yoda tells Luke. Indeed.

The editing. Some of their choices were magical. The scene of Anakin in the Temple looking across Coruscant as Padme looked from her apartment. The Jedi Purge. The three-way scene showing Obi-Wan and Yoda discovering the Temple carnage while Anakin murders the Separatists while the Emperor proclaims the birth of the Empire. The idea of paralleling Padme's death and the birth of the twins with the birth of Vader as we know him.

Anakin's Turn. I thought it was done very well. Step by step, until he reached a point of no return. And the key element that is barely implied (and that detractors ignore) is the control of the Emperor. I'm certain that his mind control over Anakin is considerable, that Anakin watches himself in horror but is inexorably drawn to his destiny.

Ewan. He shines again here. A favorite moment was seeing him standing at the top of the ramp of Padme's ship. He was hurt, angry, and disgusted in what Anakin had become. The mercy in us wants him to climb down and drag Anakin up while he still can.

The Music. This score soars. The droning male chorus accompanying the opera is as darkly iconic as the Cantina band is bright. Many sparkling moments.

The light-saber battles were spectacular.

The Imagery from this film rival Empire's. One of Sith's strengths is its compositions and "snapshots," if you will, of iconic moments. It's chock full of beautiful in-action moments.

Palpatine is Anakin's "Father" This to me was the masterstroke of the film. It was left open to interpretation, but I love feeling that I'm dead right with mine. During the opera scene, the story of Darth Plagueis passing on his knowledge and his apprentice killing him in his sleep was told pridefully as Palpatine recounted one of his greatest moments. It perfectly fits with the mysterious nature of Anakin's conception. Palpy is a genius when it comes to taking over galaxies. He knew that his ultimate, prodigal apprentice would be this boy he created, so to keep him hidden from the Jedi he created him in a slave woman on Tatooine. It mirror's the Jedi hiding Luke from the Sith in the same place! The implications make me giddy. Qui-Gon confirms this by saying something like "He would have been discovered earlier if he didn't live in the sticks." They've established in both Ep I and II that Naboo is close to Tatooine. Palpatine establishes his residency, begins his rise to power, and simultaneously watches over the neighboring boy. Again, this mirrors Obi-Wan living in near the Dune Sea to watch over Luke.

So... Was it the will of the Force or Palpatine that had Obi-Wan point to the screen and say, "Here Master... Tatooine" in Episode I? It could go either way. I'm reminded of LotR's prologue: Then something happened that Palpatine had not intended... If it wasn't his intention that the Jedi find Anakin, then he rolled with it very well and was able to time his move to Coruscant to coincide. Man... I'm not sure which is cooler. "I'll be watching your career with great interest," he tells the young boy.

I think the book goes into more detail, confirming what I suspected that Palpatine hires the Sandpeople to kidnap and torture Anakin's mother, much like Vader tortures Han, Leia, and Chewie in Empire to lure Luke to Bespin.

It helps to explain Anakin's turn and why Palpatine would even bother with this disfigured monster at the end.

What I Didn't Like: The editing. There are still clunky points here. A few scenes looked like they ran the reel a few frames too long. Scenes often felt like we barely missed the clapper board leaving frame, so the actors were cold until warmed up.

The light-saber battles, while spectacular, felt somehow detached. We need to see and feel those blows and understand what's happening, no matter how fast they are. Nick Gilliard put a lot of motivation into those fights, and I fear much of his work was lost in translation.

The births/death of the twins, Vader, and Padme felt VERY rushed and paid no heed to Luke and Leia's conversation in Jedi.

The Birth of the Rebellion. Evidently we'll see those scenes on the DVD. I was looking forward to seeing Organa and Mon Mothma confer and seed the Rebellion. See you there!
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
X2 (2003)
X-traordinary Film
5 May 2003
This film is the reason I go to the cinema.

I've been reading the exploits of the renegade team of mutant heroes for 16 years, and it has at times felt like a lonely devotion. Sure, I'd see fellow fans at the comic book store, but I never fit the fanboy mold. On the outside, meanwhile, the public was comfortable with Superman, Batman, and Spider-man but never knew about the X-Men. So, I felt content with this little universe created by Stan Lee and brought to fruition by Chris Claremont for two decades. I found high adventure, romance, cultural morality, tragedy, and joy, and I was content in a selfish way knowing that I was a part of a select few.

Three years ago, all of that changed. Bryan Singer's first X-Men proved that big budget comic book-based film could take itself seriously and gain wide support. Hugh Jackman launched his international career, and comics fans and the general public were happy. I was thrilled to see the slightest peek into the X world, knowing that the films would never be able to plumb the depths of 40 years of comic history.

Last night, I was proven wrong. Seeing X2 was a fulfillment experience, reward for my years of fandom. Every emotion I ever felt reading the series was brought back during this perfectly executed film.

The film picks up directly after the events of the first film. There is political unrest as the world decides what to do with the growing emergence of mutants among humans. Anecdotic characters represent three sides to the debate. Charles Xavier (Patrick Stewart) and his school haven for mutants including the X-Men strive for peaceful coexistence and acceptance of humans and mutants ala Martin Luther King Jr. Magneto (Ian McKellan) is his Malcolm X, believing that coexistence is not possible. A new human character, William Stryker, is Magneto's counter as a political military man bent on ridding the planet of mutants.

Thus, Bryan Singer moves with his Usual Suspect ease from character to character, giving everyone their due, their moments to shine. Here is where the movie shines. The script does not awkwardly bend to provide a Storm scene here and an unprecedented Wolverine fight there. The actions of the characters, the use of their powers, and the combats all flow naturally from the narrative. The villains in this film are drawn so completely that from certain points of view they cease to be evil. Each side has valid reasons to believe in their convictions.

Take the human point of view, for instance. The most moving scenes for me were those that let the mutant powers be completely unleashed. Magneto delights in the power and control he exhibits. Storm uses her powers in near Biblical proportions. Jean Grey traverses the film barely in control of her tremendous psychic and telekinetic powers. One impulse while witnessing their effects is to say, "That is so cool!" while the other, human side stands in awe and fear. It becomes easy to imagine large factions of normal people demanding mutant registration or worse.

Finally, events in the film's last act left me mind blown. I will give nothing away other than to say if I believed the first film was the slightest peek into the X world, then the bold path the film makers chose to take in X2 blew open the door and gave free reign to some of the most powerful stories the X-Men have to offer. The first film was the primer, X2 took the ball and ran, and I believe the best is yet to come.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed