Here i will talk about the whole movie (Volume I & II Extended 5½ hour Director's Cut version)
I find very funny (and naive) that some people, relate this movie with porn.
Such an approach would be both short-sighted and counterproductive, especially if we are talking about Lars Von Trier.
It is common, reading reviews of movies in which there are sex or nudity, and are mentioned as if it deserve to be highlighted, when in fact, it's only part of the background
Today sex is still a taboo, which is nothing more than a prohibition of doing or saying something imposed by certain respects or prejudices of social or psychological nature.
This movie had nothing to do with porn. Not at all.
The movie is about the story of a woman with a psychological-sexual disease, and the aftermath that this disease has had on her personal life.
ANALYSIS.
LVT has been one of the directors of which more deeply researched the phenomenon of human behavior and all its ramifications. But it does so from a very negative view. As a good existentialist, he examines the human condition, freedom, individual responsibility, emotions, morality, sex and meaning of life.
Franz Kafka, Hermann Hesse, Friedrich Nietzsche, Albert Camus, Jean Paul Sartre, Stanislav Lem, Andrey Tarkovski, Ingmar Bergman...... they also knew how to define -very precisely- the moods of existential emptiness and meaningless of life. Many of us have identified with these feelings they describe so well.
However, most of them have one thing in common: They do not offer solutions. They merely regret about the situation and describe it, but do not go beyond. This fact of "not going further" is the result of a lack of research in other fields, and as the main problem, leaves the viewer in a situation without options.
This is precisely what happens in Nymphomaniac, and all movies of LVT. The dialogues between the two main characters analyze the subsequent moral implications of the actions dictated by a psychological disease. Seligman provides a theological point of view, which does not seem to help much to Joe. However, despite of her behavior, Seligman try not to judge her, which I consider an essential attitude for most aspects of life.
Finally, all the analysis and situations will not lead me anywhere, but to life and its afflictions. Once they have been analyzed, we remain where we were.
About the ending,there is a clear lack of trust in humans, as beings who ultimately could transcend their wrongdoing.
There is no light at the end of the tunnel.
6,5/10
4 out of 30 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends