Reviews

4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Nightcrawler (2014)
8/10
Unique Thriller - One of the Year's Best
11 January 2015
Lou Bloom is a loner in L.A. who is searching for a career opportunity. One day that opportunity arrives in the form of a burning car and a badly injured woman on the side of the highway. Taken in by the scene, Lou feels compelled to observe the incident and pulls over. This is when he notices a freelance TV crew attempting to get a shot of the tangled mess. Lou is intrigued by the notion that you can make a living filming the atrocities across L.A. Shortly after Lou takes up the career of investigative journalism, but starts to blur the line between filming crimes and starting them.

Lou is a sociopath, unable to make a genuine human connection. Jake Gyllenhaal does a more than convincing job of playing the character with a dark, twisted view on reality. Lou sits in his house all day reading teach-yourself courses on his computer and ironing his various shirts. He is detached from the world around him and instead absorbs as much information he can find from self-help programs on the internet. Once he takes up the role of investigative journalism Lou will do anything to get a shot, including home invasion and evading ethical morals. Gyllenhaal is fantastic in showing that Lou is out to help only one person, and that is Lou. He does some of the most despicable things to further his career including manipulating a young homeless man, played by Riz Ahmed, as his new employee. Yet at the end of the day Gyllenhaal gives Lou so much charisma and passion that we still find the character likable.

The story uses the despicable acts of Lou to take stabs at the decaying genre that is crime-investigative journalism. It shows the dark and twisted mentality that news rooms are only can concerned about two things: how violent the act is, and how well the neighborhood is that it took place in. As aging producer Nina (played perfectly by Rene Russo) tells Lou, the more suburban and bloodier the footage, the better. Lou is consumed by the need to excel in the field. He starts to do anything in his power to get the most gruesome footage and will stop at nothing to make sure it gets tacked onto the six o'clock news.

Director Dan Gilroy, who is also the writer here, paints a bleak and gritty take on after-hours L.A. The cinematography is striking, moving from twisted bodies in car wrecks to grisly triple homicides. He presents the film as a character study on the surreal world of Louis Bloom. While the film draws heavily from different inspirations, most notably the parallels between Travis Bickle in Taxi Driver, Gilroy draws on enough creative differences that he creates an original film to stand apart from his predecessors. Nightcrawler offers the viewer a look into the shallow and messed up world of investigative journalism, and is one of the year's best films thanks to Gyllenhaal's twisted performance.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hudson Hawk (1991)
6/10
Interesting spoof . . . Or is it?
2 January 2015
Hudson Hawk is Bruce Willis' pet project in which he plays a world renown cat-burglar. Fresh out of jail, Hudson Hawk is forced to do a job by the mafia with his best friend Tommy. This one last job however spirals out of control and leads the Hawk all the way to Italy. Here he steals the works of Leonardo Da Vinci and unknowingly becomes part of a world domination plot by the CIA and a wealthy family.

I've never heard of this movie until last night. My friend had recommended it saying that it was one of his favorites growing up. Being a fan of most Bruce Willis movies I decided to give it a try. After shaking off that skeptical feeling I have to say that from the beginning to the end I was hysterically laughing. The acting is over the top, the dialog is awful, the script is plot-hole riddled, but it delivers an effect that keeps the audience laughing. It's like a movie that's playing with the Indiana Jones adventure style of film making and spoofing it. However, it's hard to tell if the filmmakers of Hudson Hawk made these jokes intentionally. It is questionable whether the movie is a self-parody, or just an action-adventure made very poorly. For example the character of Hudson Hawk is clearly the worst cat-burglar around, despite his reputation. He sings loud jazz music through heists, skateboards past guards and takes his sweet time to open up a safe. It's clear that Hudson Hawk is anything but a professional, and it is hilarious to the audience to see him act so outlandish. The film might be doing this on purpose, but sometimes it seems that it's not aware it's doing this at all. Is this is a clever spoof movie, or a movie that just went hilariously wrong and is great to poke fun at?
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I must have seen a different movie . . .
23 July 2007
I've been looking through other people's comments for this movie and almost everyone one of their reviews said, "If you're a fan of the show, then you'll love the movie!". So I've come to the conclusion that I must have seen a totally different movie then everyone else, because the Spongebob movie that I saw was boring, unoriginal, and lacked a lot of the humor which makes the show so great. If you're fans of the old Spongebob that gave us such classic episodes like the "KK Training Video" like I am, then I'm sorry to say you will be disappointed. This movie is like all of the new episodes of Spongebob, babyish and moronic. Not the funny kind of moronic, the mind-numbing stupid kind of moronic. The kind where Spongebob acts like a three year old and breaks down and cries every five minutes or so. I understand that the movie was aimed at kids, I was 13 when I saw it, but come on. The dialog in this movie is shameful and clearly does not represent the humor behind the show. I must have laughed one or two times throughout the entire movie. It seems as if though it lacked the charm that the show had the first two seasons. Overall very disappointing and if you are a true fan of Spongebob then you should be able to see it as well.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Unfabulous (2004–2007)
What has Nickelodeon come to . . .
19 November 2005
It may be just me, but in my opinion Nick hasn't come out with any good shows in the past three years or so. They've just lost their originality and coming out with this show just proves my point. There's nothing new or fresh in "Unfabulous" that we haven't seen in other shows. It's the same ridiculous plots over and over again. The main character has a crush on someone and in every episode she tries to do something to get his attention that backfires. Even the characters are completely lame. Abby is a corny wannabe singer that plays the guitar (now that's original), her female friend is a moron, her brother is played by one of the worst actors of his time and the parents are nitwits. I know that this show is geared at teens, but come on. Non of this reflects how teenagers really act or talk. The dialog is just ridiculous, Nick really needs to hire some new writers or they shouldn't come out with any more shows.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed