An embarrassing sequel to the underrated Zombieland 1.
The first one worked, because of ok writing, perfect cast and super tight script. Each character had an ark. Every character had his or her moment. Funny, good film.
The problem with having all the character complete their arks in a story, of course, is that means the story is over. You'd need to be a genius to capture that same buildup, again, after that;
Anyone could tell you, a sequel was a bad idea, from the start, for that simple reason.
Then they dug it up, because money, and made a sequel. Every character gets a hamfisted new ark and none of it works. It's not funny, the cast seems tired and uninspired and who can blame them? Working on something that's so obviously a deteriorated project, just for the money, must have been awful. And it shows.
My two cents. Ignore this film.
The first one worked, because of ok writing, perfect cast and super tight script. Each character had an ark. Every character had his or her moment. Funny, good film.
The problem with having all the character complete their arks in a story, of course, is that means the story is over. You'd need to be a genius to capture that same buildup, again, after that;
Anyone could tell you, a sequel was a bad idea, from the start, for that simple reason.
Then they dug it up, because money, and made a sequel. Every character gets a hamfisted new ark and none of it works. It's not funny, the cast seems tired and uninspired and who can blame them? Working on something that's so obviously a deteriorated project, just for the money, must have been awful. And it shows.
My two cents. Ignore this film.
Tell Your Friends