Change Your Image
cmt571
Ratings
Most Recently Rated
Reviews
Channel Zero (2016)
Solid, Frightening Experience
When I first heard that Syfy was making a show about creepypastas, I was skeptical at best, especially since I never found the story of Candle Cove to be scary; in fact, I viewed it as one of the weaker creepypastas out there. The few promos I saw intrigued me, though, so I gave the show a shot. I'm not sure whether that was the best or worse decision I have made about a TV series.
This show genuinely disturbed me in ways I honestly didn't know were possible. I'd like to point out that I do not find horror movies even remotely scary--American, Japanese, or otherwise--and "horror" shows even less, so I was not expecting that Channel Zero would be the one to freak me out. A huge part of this is due to the production and direction of this series. Considering that the creator/one of the writers/producers of this show was also a writer and co-producer for the show Hannibal, looking back I can see parallels in both storytelling and pacing. Instead of having jump-scares every five seconds, Candle Cove used long, slow, drawn-out shots (sometimes painfully so) to build anticipation and force you to imagine what the heck could possibly be just out of the shot, or what was going to happen. I also have to give major credit to the props, costume, and makeup departments for crafting thoroughly terrifying, organic visuals that never felt clichéd. The acting was believable, even with the child actors, but there wasn't much chemistry between any of the characters. I'm not sure if this was intentional given the main character's backstory and what's going on in the story, but it's what I've elected to believe. While it felt odd, it wasn't distracting, but did make some interactions less intense or grounded than they probably should have been. At times it seemed like there were a lot of plot-points that didn't seem to lead anywhere, but ultimately the story wrapped itself up nicely, and explained nearly everything...albeit in the freakiest, most nerve-wracking way possible.
Overall, the show was not perfect, but it was solid. I appreciated that it didn't resort to cheap horror scare tactics and tropes, and that it made a simple internet-urban-legend a dark, messed up show that got under my skin. If you enjoy traditional horror, this show might seem boring and anti-climactic, but if you can let yourself get sucked in and stick with it, then you'll probably be rewarded with some Grade-A, well-crafted nightmare fuel.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)
Solid, Two-Part Plot
Overall this was a fine film. It was nothing spectacular, but it certainly wasn't bad. The casting of Ben Affleck as Batman/ Bruce Wayne was brilliant, and he gave a fantastic performance, surpassing Christian Bale in my opinion. This movie felt like two movies combined into one, though, with the first half more of a political drama, and the second a paint-by-numbers, franchise superhero film.
I felt that the first half was extremely well done, and explored the moral conflicts of having a figure like Superman exist and act unchecked, as well as the comparison between Superman and Batman. A lot of Batman's story in particular was shown, not told, and what was told was extremely subtle. This version of Batman is different, and a lot of people will dislike how the character was portrayed, but I felt it worked very well and was a logical evolution of the masked vigilante. Where Batman's role was a welcome change of pace from the exposition-loaded superhero movies we've had the past few years, the same cannot be said for nearly any of the other characters. This movie is DC's attempt at a cinematic universe, so they had to shoe-horn in and introduce other characters they would later incorporate. Ergo, some characters felt very flat with superficial motives, and served simply to progress the plot. I give props to this movie, however, for several of its decisions in which to take the story, and for using as few tropes as possible in the process. Still, some of the tropes that were used were borderline painful to endure.
For people who are die-hard comic book fans with very rigid opinions about certain characters and their story-arcs, this is probably not a movie you'll enjoy. If you want a popcorn flick that requires little to no thought on the viewer's part, this is also not going to be a movie you enjoy. For those of you who disliked Man of Steel, however, I think you will like this movie if only because it explores the consequences of having a Superman. It had it flaws, but none of them broke the movie for me. Batman v Superman isn't necessarily "fun," but for the most part it is well executed, and deserves a 7/10.