Party Monster (2003)
1/10
I've seen backyard home movies shot by 10 year olds that look better!
23 January 2003
A home movie trying desperately to pass for a film. Not one redeeming quality here. Anyone out there who still believes narrative films can be shot on video and pass for something of substance is a fool. This piece of garbage looks terrible, sounds terrible, is poorly written and dreadfully acted. There is a reason Macaulay Culkin has not acted in a while and it isn't because he needed a break, it's because he truly SUCKS! I would expect more from Seth Green, but he sucks in this as well. Supposedly it cost 5 million to make this. It looks like they spent 5 bucks on a VHS tape and ran around New York for a day, then pieced it together with two VCRs. A complete waste of time.
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed