I watched the first episode of PGL-3......and that did it.
I stayed with the whole concept of a competition to offer amateur screenwriters and directors a chance at making their movie all the way through PGL-1 and PGL-2. I mean, I loved the idea; and I really wanted it to work, to be an honest attempt at leveling the playing field a little...just a little.
Yes, I groaned at Pete Jones winning for a script I found borderline offensive in PGL-1, but then I recalled there was a great movie about children and death that I saw years ago in college (it was French and made just after WW2..."something Garden"...but I can't remember the name of it) that sounded foul and turned out to be brilliant, so I accepted it as one of those "Maybe this could work" moments. It didn't.
Then came 2, and I liked the script for "Battle of Shaker Heights" but the panel seemed to almost deliberately choose the worst two directors to make it, a pair of guys who wouldn't know sensitive unless it slapped them up side the head. But I convinced myself it could be seen as an experiment in trying something different, a collision of Yin and Yang to see if we get fusion (though it took a LOT of convincing). The directors ruined that script.
And now...now we have a series where the studio (which I refuse to name because I now despise it) forces the worst script to be the winner of the "competition" (and Matt and Ben roll over like a nice pair of...well, you know whats) and then the middle-aged son of an actor who was in Craven's "Nightmare On Elm Street 2" is chosen to direct, despite him having no vision, no passion, no communication abilities, no concept of the creature, no nothing to show for himself except a pair of fairly decent shorts. It was then I had to admit to myself this show was never about giving amateurs a chance to make a movie, it was just about making another "reality" TV show that is scripted to within an inch of its existence. (Could the set-up be more obvious? The old Lincoln that won't start and with the tape on the seats; the credit cards that don't work; the "Eyeore" personality.) I actually screamed at the TV when I saw it.
Yes, I was angry at the suggestion that the viewers are so stupid they can't see through this three-card-Monte nonsense. But even more, I was hurt. I really thought Ben and Matt , considering the breaks they've received (and made very good use of), meant it when they set up Project Greenlight. Well, to paraphrase a too-well known saying, "What fools we mortals be." Blind fools willing to believe anything we're told if we want to, badly enough.
So if you want to see how movies get made in Hollywood, go ahead and watch this "reality series". You'll learn it's not what you know or how good you are that gets you ahead, it's who you know and whether or not they like the initial concept. And maybe that's the ultimate message.
As for me, I'm still fool enough to hope the movie turns out well. But I won't watch anymore of this thing. All it will remind me of is promises broken.
I stayed with the whole concept of a competition to offer amateur screenwriters and directors a chance at making their movie all the way through PGL-1 and PGL-2. I mean, I loved the idea; and I really wanted it to work, to be an honest attempt at leveling the playing field a little...just a little.
Yes, I groaned at Pete Jones winning for a script I found borderline offensive in PGL-1, but then I recalled there was a great movie about children and death that I saw years ago in college (it was French and made just after WW2..."something Garden"...but I can't remember the name of it) that sounded foul and turned out to be brilliant, so I accepted it as one of those "Maybe this could work" moments. It didn't.
Then came 2, and I liked the script for "Battle of Shaker Heights" but the panel seemed to almost deliberately choose the worst two directors to make it, a pair of guys who wouldn't know sensitive unless it slapped them up side the head. But I convinced myself it could be seen as an experiment in trying something different, a collision of Yin and Yang to see if we get fusion (though it took a LOT of convincing). The directors ruined that script.
And now...now we have a series where the studio (which I refuse to name because I now despise it) forces the worst script to be the winner of the "competition" (and Matt and Ben roll over like a nice pair of...well, you know whats) and then the middle-aged son of an actor who was in Craven's "Nightmare On Elm Street 2" is chosen to direct, despite him having no vision, no passion, no communication abilities, no concept of the creature, no nothing to show for himself except a pair of fairly decent shorts. It was then I had to admit to myself this show was never about giving amateurs a chance to make a movie, it was just about making another "reality" TV show that is scripted to within an inch of its existence. (Could the set-up be more obvious? The old Lincoln that won't start and with the tape on the seats; the credit cards that don't work; the "Eyeore" personality.) I actually screamed at the TV when I saw it.
Yes, I was angry at the suggestion that the viewers are so stupid they can't see through this three-card-Monte nonsense. But even more, I was hurt. I really thought Ben and Matt , considering the breaks they've received (and made very good use of), meant it when they set up Project Greenlight. Well, to paraphrase a too-well known saying, "What fools we mortals be." Blind fools willing to believe anything we're told if we want to, badly enough.
So if you want to see how movies get made in Hollywood, go ahead and watch this "reality series". You'll learn it's not what you know or how good you are that gets you ahead, it's who you know and whether or not they like the initial concept. And maybe that's the ultimate message.
As for me, I'm still fool enough to hope the movie turns out well. But I won't watch anymore of this thing. All it will remind me of is promises broken.