VERY unrealistic! How many people have to argue about collateral damage? It shows too much drama over political/legal power vs military objective. Political correctness wins unfortunately on this film. Cannot see how the writers and directors can argue SO much with military orders and how the military in the film can blatantly disregard orders. Then the strategy turns to playing the game and they still do not win. Wonders of cinema and technology do not overstretch the challenge of war for the betterment of all people, especially when we are not on a level playing field. What is the point of writing all this to make sure we point out the plot in 10 lines!?
Review of Eye in the Sky
