4/10
Interesting premise, underwhelming execution
31 December 2020
OVERVIEW: This film receives a 4/10 from me; +interesting premise +post apocalyptic and science fiction atmosphere is cool +some well designed sets +some moments of fair quality acting -poor/hard to follow story -boring film on the whole -bad acting in many places -poor CGI -poor direction -moments of ridiculousness indicating a poorly written script

A description and my thoughts follow:

The Midnight Sky is an interesting film, following a scientist stranded on Earth after nuclear or environmental devastation. He has remained behind due to sickness, and is helping spaceships navigate there way out of Earth - and he awaits the return of long term spaceships that have traveled deep into the solar system, on there way home not knowing what has happened. The movie flips between the scientist and a crew of astronauts making there way home from K-23 - a newly discovered inhabitable moon in orbit around Jupiter.

This movie sounded great, and indeed has some cool atmosphere to it. A post-apocalyptic world ravaged by radiation and deep cold from a nuclear event, and a space drama about a crew returning home with no communications from Earth. The atmosphere, and some of the set quality, is great, and the acting not too bad, although there are moments of drama that falls flat due to poor direction on the actors part. The story itself, while interesting in theory, largely falls apart, and the film feels uninteresting and is difficult to follow with any clarity. I was looking forward to this one, but in the end was disappointed and largely bored by this film.

This film receives a 4/10 from me.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed