5/10
So...
8 October 2022
Warning: Spoilers
I like Norse Mythology, I think it's amazing.

I found some very interesting points in the film, they are:

The thor resurrect one of his goats after devouring it.

Adding the importance of humans to mythology, essentially at the end when Roskva comes into contact with fenrir.

Having placed a giant beside Asgard.

Access to bifrost will be granted by gods without Heimdallr.

Thor is not represented by a strong young man with blue eyes and blond hair.

Thor told the story about the fenrir in beginning.

The Nordic mood added to the film, and the importance of goats to Thor.

However, due to the negative points, equilibrium occurs. Due to not having the copyright to be able to explore Loki, this greatly diminishes the potential that the film could have.

The villain has no enriching potential.

They could have explored the other gods.

The fenrir was very poorly produced by CG.

The eye of Odin idea was cool, but it looked like Gandalf from LOR to me. The wisdom that it should have was not explored at all.

For those who like Norse Mythology, the movie is worth seeing for some interesting details, but it's not something that will make you admire it for the rest of your life.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed